Demographics details for Fairfield bay, AR vs Cleburne, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fairfield bay, AR vs Cleburne, TX.

Data Fairfield bay Cleburne
Population 2,152 33,826
Median Age 68.2 years 35.2 years
Median Income $58,750 $60,929
Married Families 48.0% 39.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 11%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.9

Population Comparison: Fairfield bay vs Cleburne

  • The population in Cleburne is higher at 33,826, compared to 2,152 in Fairfield bay.
  • Residents in Fairfield bay have a higher median age of 68.2 years compared to 35.2 years in Cleburne.
  • Cleburne has a higher median income of $60,929, compared to $58,750 in Fairfield bay.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Fairfield bay at 48.0% compared to 39.0% in Cleburne.
  • The poverty level is higher in Cleburne at 11%, compared to 0% in Fairfield bay.
  • Cleburne has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.5% in Fairfield bay.

Demographics

Demographics Fairfield bay vs Cleburne provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fairfield bay Cleburne
Black 1 6
White 86 52
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 7 29
Two or More Races 5 11
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Fairfield bay vs Cleburne

  • In Cleburne, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 1% in Fairfield bay.
  • Fairfield bay has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 52% in Cleburne.
  • Both Fairfield bay and Cleburne have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • Cleburne has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 7% in Fairfield bay.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cleburne at 11%, compared to 5% in Fairfield bay.
  • In Cleburne, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fairfield bay.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fairfield bay Cleburne
Mental Health Not Good 19.1% 18.6%
Physical Health Not Good 12.7% 13.3%
Depression 27.1% 23.6%
Smoking 20.2% 20.0%
Binge Drinking 15.7% 17.9%
Obesity 37.3% 37.6%
Disability Percentage 32.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fairfield bay vs Cleburne

  • More residents in Fairfield bay report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 18.6% in Cleburne.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Fairfield bay at 27.1% compared to 23.6% in Cleburne.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Fairfield bay at 20.2% compared to 20.0% in Cleburne.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Cleburne at 17.9% compared to 15.7% in Fairfield bay.
  • Cleburne has higher obesity rates at 37.6% compared to 37.3% in Fairfield bay.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Fairfield bay at 32.0% compared to 11.0% in Cleburne.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fairfield bay Cleburne
No Schooling 0.2% (5) 1.4% (471)
High School Diploma 24.6% (529) 17.8% (6,005)
Less than High School 7.0% (151) 17.8% (6,010)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 33.9% (729) 10.0% (3,384)

Education Levels Comparison: Fairfield bay vs Cleburne

  • In Cleburne, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.2% in Fairfield bay.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield bay hold a high school diploma at 24.6% compared to 17.8% in Cleburne.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cleburne at 17.8%, compared to 7.0% in Fairfield bay.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield bay hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.9% compared to 10.0% in Cleburne.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.