Demographics details for Fairfield bay, AR vs Camp hill, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairfield bay, AR vs Camp hill, PA.
| Data | Fairfield bay | Camp hill |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,152 | 8,204 |
| Median Age | 68.2 years | 42.5 years |
| Median Income | $58,750 | $104,959 |
| Married Families | 48.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Fairfield bay vs Camp hill
- The population in Camp hill is higher at 8,204, compared to 2,152 in Fairfield bay.
- Residents in Fairfield bay have a higher median age of 68.2 years compared to 42.5 years in Camp hill.
- Camp hill has a higher median income of $104,959, compared to $58,750 in Fairfield bay.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fairfield bay at 48.0% compared to 44.0% in Camp hill.
- The poverty level is higher in Camp hill at 5%, compared to 0% in Fairfield bay.
- Camp hill has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.5% in Fairfield bay.
Demographics
Demographics Fairfield bay vs Camp hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairfield bay | Camp hill |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 2 |
| White | 86 | 82 |
| Asian | 1 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairfield bay vs Camp hill
- In Camp hill, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Fairfield bay.
- Fairfield bay has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 82% in Camp hill.
- In Camp hill, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 1% in Fairfield bay.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fairfield bay at 7% compared to 5% in Camp hill.
- Both Fairfield bay and Camp hill have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairfield bay and Camp hill at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairfield bay | Camp hill |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 13.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 9.0% |
| Depression | 27.1% | 20.4% |
| Smoking | 20.2% | 12.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 17.3% |
| Obesity | 37.3% | 28.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 32.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairfield bay vs Camp hill
- More residents in Fairfield bay report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 13.8% in Camp hill.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fairfield bay at 27.1% compared to 20.4% in Camp hill.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fairfield bay at 20.2% compared to 12.8% in Camp hill.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Camp hill at 17.3% compared to 15.7% in Fairfield bay.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fairfield bay at 37.3% compared to 28.8% in Camp hill.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fairfield bay at 32.0% compared to 10.0% in Camp hill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairfield bay | Camp hill |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (5) | 0.6% (51) |
| High School Diploma | 24.6% (529) | 9.2% (756) |
| Less than High School | 7.0% (151) | 4.6% (381) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 33.9% (729) | 41.3% (3,388) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairfield bay vs Camp hill
- In Camp hill, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.2% in Fairfield bay.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield bay hold a high school diploma at 24.6% compared to 9.2% in Camp hill.
- More residents in Fairfield bay have less than a high school education at 7.0% compared to 4.6% in Camp hill.
- In Camp hill, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.3% compared to 33.9% in Fairfield bay.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.