Demographics details for Fairburn, GA vs Vicksburg, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairburn, GA vs Vicksburg, MS.
Data | Fairburn | Vicksburg |
---|---|---|
Population | 16,956 | 20,391 |
Median Age | 30.9 years | 37.6 years |
Median Income | $67,245 | $45,147 |
Married Families | 20.0% | 26.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 24% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Fairburn vs Vicksburg
- The population in Vicksburg is higher at 20,391, compared to 16,956 in Fairburn.
- The median age in Vicksburg is higher at 37.6 years, compared to 30.9 years in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has a higher median income of $67,245 compared to $45,147 in Vicksburg.
- In Vicksburg, the percentage of married families is higher at 26.0%, compared to 20.0% in Fairburn.
- The poverty level is higher in Vicksburg at 24%, compared to 15% in Fairburn.
- Vicksburg has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.2% in Fairburn.
Demographics
Demographics Fairburn vs Vicksburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fairburn | Vicksburg |
---|---|---|
Black | 73 | 72 |
White | 12 | 22 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 12 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairburn vs Vicksburg
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairburn at 73% compared to 72% in Vicksburg.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Vicksburg at 22% compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- Both Fairburn and Vicksburg have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fairburn at 12% compared to 3% in Vicksburg.
- Both Fairburn and Vicksburg have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 3%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairburn and Vicksburg at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fairburn | Vicksburg |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 17.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 14.4% |
Depression | 16.8% | 20.6% |
Smoking | 15.6% | 23.2% |
Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 11.5% |
Obesity | 33.7% | 46.1% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairburn vs Vicksburg
- In Vicksburg, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 15.4% in Fairburn.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Vicksburg at 20.6% versus 16.8% in Fairburn.
- Vicksburg has a higher smoking rate at 23.2% compared to 15.6% in Fairburn.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fairburn at 15.0% compared to 11.5% in Vicksburg.
- Vicksburg has higher obesity rates at 46.1% compared to 33.7% in Fairburn.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Vicksburg at 20.0% compared to 7.0% in Fairburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fairburn | Vicksburg |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (78) | 1.0% (214) |
High School Diploma | 12.3% (2,082) | 14.8% (3,028) |
Less than High School | 5.7% (961) | 11.8% (2,397) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.2% (3,591) | 17.7% (3,605) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairburn vs Vicksburg
- In Vicksburg, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.5% in Fairburn.
- In Vicksburg, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.8% compared to 12.3% in Fairburn.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Vicksburg at 11.8%, compared to 5.7% in Fairburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairburn hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 17.7% in Vicksburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.