Demographics details for Fairburn, GA vs Tishomingo, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairburn, GA vs Tishomingo, OK.
| Data | Fairburn | Tishomingo |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,956 | 3,115 |
| Median Age | 30.9 years | 30.2 years |
| Median Income | $67,245 | $32,063 |
| Married Families | 20.0% | 22.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Fairburn vs Tishomingo
- In Fairburn, the population is higher at 16,956, compared to 3,115 in Tishomingo.
- Residents in Fairburn have a higher median age of 30.9 years compared to 30.2 years in Tishomingo.
- Fairburn has a higher median income of $67,245 compared to $32,063 in Tishomingo.
- In Tishomingo, the percentage of married families is higher at 22.0%, compared to 20.0% in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 14% in Tishomingo.
- The unemployment rate in Fairburn is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Tishomingo.
Demographics
Demographics Fairburn vs Tishomingo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairburn | Tishomingo |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 73 | 4 |
| White | 12 | 56 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 12 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 13 |
Demographics Comparison: Fairburn vs Tishomingo
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairburn at 73% compared to 4% in Tishomingo.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Tishomingo at 56% compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- Both Fairburn and Tishomingo have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fairburn at 12% compared to 9% in Tishomingo.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Tishomingo at 18%, compared to 3% in Fairburn.
- In Tishomingo, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 13%, compared to 0% in Fairburn.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairburn | Tishomingo |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 20.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 14.3% |
| Depression | 16.8% | 27.1% |
| Smoking | 15.6% | 22.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 13.9% |
| Obesity | 33.7% | 42.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairburn vs Tishomingo
- In Tishomingo, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 15.4% in Fairburn.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Tishomingo at 27.1% versus 16.8% in Fairburn.
- Tishomingo has a higher smoking rate at 22.8% compared to 15.6% in Fairburn.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fairburn at 15.0% compared to 13.9% in Tishomingo.
- Tishomingo has higher obesity rates at 42.2% compared to 33.7% in Fairburn.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Tishomingo at 23.0% compared to 7.0% in Fairburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairburn | Tishomingo |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (78) | 0.4% (13) |
| High School Diploma | 12.3% (2,082) | 14.1% (438) |
| Less than High School | 5.7% (961) | 10.5% (328) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.2% (3,591) | 13.2% (412) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairburn vs Tishomingo
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairburn have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.4% in Tishomingo.
- In Tishomingo, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.1% compared to 12.3% in Fairburn.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Tishomingo at 10.5%, compared to 5.7% in Fairburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairburn hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 13.2% in Tishomingo.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.