Demographics details for Fairburn, GA vs Paramus, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairburn, GA vs Paramus, NJ.
| Data | Fairburn | Paramus |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,956 | 26,359 |
| Median Age | 30.9 years | 49.0 years |
| Median Income | $67,245 | $136,824 |
| Married Families | 20.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 4% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Fairburn vs Paramus
- The population in Paramus is higher at 26,359, compared to 16,956 in Fairburn.
- The median age in Paramus is higher at 49.0 years, compared to 30.9 years in Fairburn.
- Paramus has a higher median income of $136,824, compared to $67,245 in Fairburn.
- In Paramus, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 20.0% in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 4% in Paramus.
- Paramus has a higher unemployment rate at 4.3% compared to 4.2% in Fairburn.
Demographics
Demographics Fairburn vs Paramus provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairburn | Paramus |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 73 | 3 |
| White | 12 | 50 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 24 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 14 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Fairburn vs Paramus
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairburn at 73% compared to 3% in Paramus.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Paramus at 50% compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- In Paramus, the Asian population stands at 24%, greater than 0% in Fairburn.
- Paramus has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 14%, compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Paramus at 8%, compared to 3% in Fairburn.
- In Paramus, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fairburn.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairburn | Paramus |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 12.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 7.6% |
| Depression | 16.8% | 16.1% |
| Smoking | 15.6% | 10.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 33.7% | 22.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairburn vs Paramus
- More residents in Fairburn report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 12.7% in Paramus.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fairburn at 16.8% compared to 16.1% in Paramus.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fairburn at 15.6% compared to 10.9% in Paramus.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Paramus at 17.0% compared to 15.0% in Fairburn.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fairburn at 33.7% compared to 22.8% in Paramus.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Paramus at 9.0% compared to 7.0% in Fairburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairburn | Paramus |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (78) | 0.7% (194) |
| High School Diploma | 12.3% (2,082) | 15.2% (4,006) |
| Less than High School | 5.7% (961) | 6.7% (1,764) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.2% (3,591) | 37.1% (9,785) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairburn vs Paramus
- In Paramus, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Fairburn.
- In Paramus, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.2% compared to 12.3% in Fairburn.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Paramus at 6.7%, compared to 5.7% in Fairburn.
- In Paramus, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 37.1% compared to 21.2% in Fairburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.