Demographics details for Fairburn, GA vs Paramount, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairburn, GA vs Paramount, CA.
| Data | Fairburn | Paramount |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,956 | 51,653 |
| Median Age | 30.9 years | 31.9 years |
| Median Income | $67,245 | $67,197 |
| Married Families | 20.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 6.4 |
Population Comparison: Fairburn vs Paramount
- The population in Paramount is higher at 51,653, compared to 16,956 in Fairburn.
- The median age in Paramount is higher at 31.9 years, compared to 30.9 years in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has a higher median income of $67,245 compared to $67,197 in Paramount.
- In Paramount, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 20.0% in Fairburn.
- The poverty level is identical in both Fairburn and Paramount at 15%.
- Paramount has a higher unemployment rate at 6.4% compared to 4.2% in Fairburn.
Demographics
Demographics Fairburn vs Paramount provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairburn | Paramount |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 73 | 9 |
| White | 12 | -20 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 84 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 21 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Fairburn vs Paramount
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairburn at 73% compared to 9% in Paramount.
- Fairburn has a higher percentage of White residents at 12% compared to -20% in Paramount.
- In Paramount, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Fairburn.
- Paramount has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 84%, compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Paramount at 21%, compared to 3% in Fairburn.
- In Paramount, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Fairburn.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairburn | Paramount |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 14.4% |
| Depression | 16.8% | 16.2% |
| Smoking | 15.6% | 13.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 14.2% |
| Obesity | 33.7% | 34.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairburn vs Paramount
- In Paramount, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 15.4% in Fairburn.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fairburn at 16.8% compared to 16.2% in Paramount.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fairburn at 15.6% compared to 13.3% in Paramount.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fairburn at 15.0% compared to 14.2% in Paramount.
- Paramount has higher obesity rates at 34.2% compared to 33.7% in Fairburn.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Paramount at 8.0% compared to 7.0% in Fairburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairburn | Paramount |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (78) | 5.0% (2,572) |
| High School Diploma | 12.3% (2,082) | 16.3% (8,418) |
| Less than High School | 5.7% (961) | 42.4% (21,924) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.2% (3,591) | 8.3% (4,297) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairburn vs Paramount
- In Paramount, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 5.0% compared to 0.5% in Fairburn.
- In Paramount, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.3% compared to 12.3% in Fairburn.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Paramount at 42.4%, compared to 5.7% in Fairburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairburn hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 8.3% in Paramount.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.