Demographics details for Fairburn, GA vs Norristown, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairburn, GA vs Norristown, PA.
Data | Fairburn | Norristown |
---|---|---|
Population | 16,956 | 35,795 |
Median Age | 30.9 years | 32.4 years |
Median Income | $67,245 | $59,068 |
Married Families | 20.0% | 26.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Fairburn vs Norristown
- The population in Norristown is higher at 35,795, compared to 16,956 in Fairburn.
- The median age in Norristown is higher at 32.4 years, compared to 30.9 years in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has a higher median income of $67,245 compared to $59,068 in Norristown.
- In Norristown, the percentage of married families is higher at 26.0%, compared to 20.0% in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Norristown.
- The unemployment rate in Fairburn is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.3% in Norristown.
Demographics
Demographics Fairburn vs Norristown provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fairburn | Norristown |
---|---|---|
Black | 73 | 33 |
White | 12 | 19 |
Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
Hispanic | 12 | 27 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 16 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Fairburn vs Norristown
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairburn at 73% compared to 33% in Norristown.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Norristown at 19% compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- In Norristown, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Fairburn.
- Norristown has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 27%, compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Norristown at 16%, compared to 3% in Fairburn.
- In Norristown, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Fairburn.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fairburn | Norristown |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 18.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 14.3% |
Depression | 16.8% | 20.3% |
Smoking | 15.6% | 21.4% |
Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 14.9% |
Obesity | 33.7% | 40.8% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairburn vs Norristown
- In Norristown, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 15.4% in Fairburn.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Norristown at 20.3% versus 16.8% in Fairburn.
- Norristown has a higher smoking rate at 21.4% compared to 15.6% in Fairburn.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fairburn at 15.0% compared to 14.9% in Norristown.
- Norristown has higher obesity rates at 40.8% compared to 33.7% in Fairburn.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Norristown at 14.0% compared to 7.0% in Fairburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fairburn | Norristown |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (78) | 1.3% (479) |
High School Diploma | 12.3% (2,082) | 20.1% (7,193) |
Less than High School | 5.7% (961) | 15.9% (5,695) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.2% (3,591) | 14.4% (5,148) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairburn vs Norristown
- In Norristown, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.5% in Fairburn.
- In Norristown, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.1% compared to 12.3% in Fairburn.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Norristown at 15.9%, compared to 5.7% in Fairburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairburn hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 14.4% in Norristown.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.