Demographics details for Fairburn, GA vs Norfolk, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairburn, GA vs Norfolk, NE.
| Data | Fairburn | Norfolk |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,956 | 25,928 |
| Median Age | 30.9 years | 36.8 years |
| Median Income | $67,245 | $57,479 |
| Married Families | 20.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Fairburn vs Norfolk
- The population in Norfolk is higher at 25,928, compared to 16,956 in Fairburn.
- The median age in Norfolk is higher at 36.8 years, compared to 30.9 years in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has a higher median income of $67,245 compared to $57,479 in Norfolk.
- In Norfolk, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 20.0% in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Norfolk.
- The unemployment rate in Fairburn is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.1% in Norfolk.
Demographics
Demographics Fairburn vs Norfolk provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairburn | Norfolk |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 73 | 1 |
| White | 12 | 75 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 14 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Fairburn vs Norfolk
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairburn at 73% compared to 1% in Norfolk.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Norfolk at 75% compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- In Norfolk, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Fairburn.
- Norfolk has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 14%, compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Norfolk at 8%, compared to 3% in Fairburn.
- In Norfolk, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fairburn.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairburn | Norfolk |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 14.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 10.1% |
| Depression | 16.8% | 18.5% |
| Smoking | 15.6% | 16.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 21.4% |
| Obesity | 33.7% | 37.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairburn vs Norfolk
- More residents in Fairburn report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 14.3% in Norfolk.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Norfolk at 18.5% versus 16.8% in Fairburn.
- Norfolk has a higher smoking rate at 16.9% compared to 15.6% in Fairburn.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Norfolk at 21.4% compared to 15.0% in Fairburn.
- Norfolk has higher obesity rates at 37.1% compared to 33.7% in Fairburn.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Norfolk at 11.0% compared to 7.0% in Fairburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairburn | Norfolk |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (78) | 1.3% (340) |
| High School Diploma | 12.3% (2,082) | 18.2% (4,708) |
| Less than High School | 5.7% (961) | 8.1% (2,107) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.2% (3,591) | 16.6% (4,308) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairburn vs Norfolk
- In Norfolk, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.5% in Fairburn.
- In Norfolk, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.2% compared to 12.3% in Fairburn.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Norfolk at 8.1%, compared to 5.7% in Fairburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairburn hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 16.6% in Norfolk.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.