Demographics details for Fairburn, GA vs New haven, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairburn, GA vs New haven, CT.
| Data | Fairburn | New haven |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,956 | 138,915 |
| Median Age | 30.9 years | 31.0 years |
| Median Income | $67,245 | $54,305 |
| Married Families | 20.0% | 21.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 19% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Fairburn vs New haven
- The population in New haven is higher at 138,915, compared to 16,956 in Fairburn.
- The median age in New haven is higher at 31.0 years, compared to 30.9 years in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has a higher median income of $67,245 compared to $54,305 in New haven.
- In New haven, the percentage of married families is higher at 21.0%, compared to 20.0% in Fairburn.
- The poverty level is higher in New haven at 19%, compared to 15% in Fairburn.
- The unemployment rate in Fairburn is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in New haven.
Demographics
Demographics Fairburn vs New haven provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairburn | New haven |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 73 | 29 |
| White | 12 | 27 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 30 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairburn vs New haven
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairburn at 73% compared to 29% in New haven.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in New haven at 27% compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- In New haven, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Fairburn.
- New haven has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in New haven at 9%, compared to 3% in Fairburn.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairburn and New haven at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairburn | New haven |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 16.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 16.8% | 19.8% |
| Smoking | 15.6% | 19.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 13.0% |
| Obesity | 33.7% | 37.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairburn vs New haven
- In New haven, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 15.4% in Fairburn.
- Higher depression rates are seen in New haven at 19.8% versus 16.8% in Fairburn.
- New haven has a higher smoking rate at 19.2% compared to 15.6% in Fairburn.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fairburn at 15.0% compared to 13.0% in New haven.
- New haven has higher obesity rates at 37.4% compared to 33.7% in Fairburn.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in New haven at 10.0% compared to 7.0% in Fairburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairburn | New haven |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (78) | 1.2% (1,674) |
| High School Diploma | 12.3% (2,082) | 15.7% (21,744) |
| Less than High School | 5.7% (961) | 15.1% (20,913) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.2% (3,591) | 23.5% (32,679) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairburn vs New haven
- In New haven, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.5% in Fairburn.
- In New haven, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.7% compared to 12.3% in Fairburn.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in New haven at 15.1%, compared to 5.7% in Fairburn.
- In New haven, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.5% compared to 21.2% in Fairburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.