Demographics details for Fairburn, GA vs Loma linda, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairburn, GA vs Loma linda, CA.
| Data | Fairburn | Loma linda |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,956 | 25,129 |
| Median Age | 30.9 years | 37.8 years |
| Median Income | $67,245 | $70,685 |
| Married Families | 20.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Fairburn vs Loma linda
- The population in Loma linda is higher at 25,129, compared to 16,956 in Fairburn.
- The median age in Loma linda is higher at 37.8 years, compared to 30.9 years in Fairburn.
- Loma linda has a higher median income of $70,685, compared to $67,245 in Fairburn.
- In Loma linda, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 20.0% in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Loma linda.
- The unemployment rate in Fairburn is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.7% in Loma linda.
Demographics
Demographics Fairburn vs Loma linda provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairburn | Loma linda |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 73 | 6 |
| White | 12 | 28 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 26 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 28 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Fairburn vs Loma linda
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairburn at 73% compared to 6% in Loma linda.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Loma linda at 28% compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- In Loma linda, the Asian population stands at 26%, greater than 0% in Fairburn.
- Loma linda has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 28%, compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Loma linda at 11%, compared to 3% in Fairburn.
- In Loma linda, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fairburn.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairburn | Loma linda |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 15.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 10.2% |
| Depression | 16.8% | 16.5% |
| Smoking | 15.6% | 11.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 13.9% |
| Obesity | 33.7% | 31.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairburn vs Loma linda
- More residents in Fairburn report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 15.1% in Loma linda.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fairburn at 16.8% compared to 16.5% in Loma linda.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fairburn at 15.6% compared to 11.1% in Loma linda.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fairburn at 15.0% compared to 13.9% in Loma linda.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fairburn at 33.7% compared to 31.7% in Loma linda.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Loma linda at 13.0% compared to 7.0% in Fairburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairburn | Loma linda |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (78) | 1.6% (401) |
| High School Diploma | 12.3% (2,082) | 9.5% (2,397) |
| Less than High School | 5.7% (961) | 13.1% (3,304) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.2% (3,591) | 35.4% (8,904) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairburn vs Loma linda
- In Loma linda, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.5% in Fairburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairburn hold a high school diploma at 12.3% compared to 9.5% in Loma linda.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Loma linda at 13.1%, compared to 5.7% in Fairburn.
- In Loma linda, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.4% compared to 21.2% in Fairburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.