Demographics details for Fairburn, GA vs Interlachen, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairburn, GA vs Interlachen, FL.
| Data | Fairburn | Interlachen |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,956 | 1,457 |
| Median Age | 30.9 years | 48.6 years |
| Median Income | $67,245 | $50,776 |
| Married Families | 20.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Fairburn vs Interlachen
- In Fairburn, the population is higher at 16,956, compared to 1,457 in Interlachen.
- The median age in Interlachen is higher at 48.6 years, compared to 30.9 years in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has a higher median income of $67,245 compared to $50,776 in Interlachen.
- In Interlachen, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 20.0% in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in Interlachen.
- Interlachen has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.2% in Fairburn.
Demographics
Demographics Fairburn vs Interlachen provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairburn | Interlachen |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 73 | 11 |
| White | 12 | 37 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 12 | 34 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairburn vs Interlachen
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairburn at 73% compared to 11% in Interlachen.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Interlachen at 37% compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- Both Fairburn and Interlachen have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Interlachen has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 34%, compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Interlachen at 18%, compared to 3% in Fairburn.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairburn and Interlachen at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairburn | Interlachen |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 16.8% | 20.3% |
| Smoking | 15.6% | 24.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 33.7% | 35.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairburn vs Interlachen
- In Interlachen, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 15.4% in Fairburn.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Interlachen at 20.3% versus 16.8% in Fairburn.
- Interlachen has a higher smoking rate at 24.5% compared to 15.6% in Fairburn.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Interlachen at 16.7% compared to 15.0% in Fairburn.
- Interlachen has higher obesity rates at 35.5% compared to 33.7% in Fairburn.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Interlachen at 18.0% compared to 7.0% in Fairburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairburn | Interlachen |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (78) | 2.0% (29) |
| High School Diploma | 12.3% (2,082) | 22.0% (320) |
| Less than High School | 5.7% (961) | 41.7% (607) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.2% (3,591) | 10.4% (151) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairburn vs Interlachen
- In Interlachen, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.5% in Fairburn.
- In Interlachen, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.0% compared to 12.3% in Fairburn.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Interlachen at 41.7%, compared to 5.7% in Fairburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairburn hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 10.4% in Interlachen.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.