Demographics details for Fairburn, GA vs Harbinger, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairburn, GA vs Harbinger, NC.
| Data | Fairburn | Harbinger |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,956 | 1,070 |
| Median Age | 30.9 years | 45.0 years |
| Median Income | $67,245 | $70,000 |
| Married Families | 20.0% | 0.58% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 0.04 |
Population Comparison: Fairburn vs Harbinger
- In Fairburn, the population is higher at 16,956, compared to 1,070 in Harbinger.
- The median age in Harbinger is higher at 45.0 years, compared to 30.9 years in Fairburn.
- Harbinger has a higher median income of $70,000, compared to $67,245 in Fairburn.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fairburn at 20.0% compared to 0.58% in Harbinger.
- Fairburn has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 0% in Harbinger.
- The unemployment rate in Fairburn is higher at 4.2%, compared to 0.04% in Harbinger.
Demographics
Demographics Fairburn vs Harbinger provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairburn | Harbinger |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 73 | 15 |
| White | 12 | 75 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairburn vs Harbinger
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairburn at 73% compared to 15% in Harbinger.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Harbinger at 75% compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- In Harbinger, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Fairburn.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fairburn at 12% compared to 5% in Harbinger.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fairburn at 3% compared to 0% in Harbinger.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairburn and Harbinger at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairburn | Harbinger |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 16.8% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 15.6% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.0% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 33.7% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairburn vs Harbinger
- More residents in Fairburn report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 0.0% in Harbinger.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fairburn at 16.8% compared to 0.0% in Harbinger.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fairburn at 15.6% compared to 0.0% in Harbinger.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fairburn at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in Harbinger.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fairburn at 33.7% compared to 0.0% in Harbinger.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fairburn at 7.0% compared to 0.0% in Harbinger.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairburn | Harbinger |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (78) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 12.3% (2,082) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 5.7% (961) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.2% (3,591) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairburn vs Harbinger
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairburn have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Harbinger.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairburn hold a high school diploma at 12.3% compared to 0.0% in Harbinger.
- More residents in Fairburn have less than a high school education at 5.7% compared to 0.0% in Harbinger.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairburn hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 0.0% in Harbinger.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.