Demographics details for Fairburn, GA vs Goliad, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairburn, GA vs Goliad, TX.
Data | Fairburn | Goliad |
---|---|---|
Population | 16,956 | 7,131 |
Median Age | 30.9 years | 44.7 years |
Median Income | $67,245 | $58,125 |
Married Families | 20.0% | 42.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Fairburn vs Goliad
- In Fairburn, the population is higher at 16,956, compared to 7,131 in Goliad.
- The median age in Goliad is higher at 44.7 years, compared to 30.9 years in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has a higher median income of $67,245 compared to $58,125 in Goliad.
- In Goliad, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 20.0% in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in Goliad.
- Goliad has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.2% in Fairburn.
Demographics
Demographics Fairburn vs Goliad provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fairburn | Goliad |
---|---|---|
Black | 73 | 5 |
White | 12 | 46 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 12 | 36 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 13 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairburn vs Goliad
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairburn at 73% compared to 5% in Goliad.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Goliad at 46% compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- Both Fairburn and Goliad have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Goliad has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 36%, compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Goliad at 13%, compared to 3% in Fairburn.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairburn and Goliad at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fairburn | Goliad |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 17.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 12.0% |
Depression | 16.8% | 22.9% |
Smoking | 15.6% | 16.4% |
Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 18.5% |
Obesity | 33.7% | 37.9% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairburn vs Goliad
- In Goliad, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 15.4% in Fairburn.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Goliad at 22.9% versus 16.8% in Fairburn.
- Goliad has a higher smoking rate at 16.4% compared to 15.6% in Fairburn.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Goliad at 18.5% compared to 15.0% in Fairburn.
- Goliad has higher obesity rates at 37.9% compared to 33.7% in Fairburn.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Goliad at 17.0% compared to 7.0% in Fairburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fairburn | Goliad |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (78) | 0.6% (44) |
High School Diploma | 12.3% (2,082) | 18.7% (1,337) |
Less than High School | 5.7% (961) | 21.3% (1,516) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.2% (3,591) | 12.6% (900) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairburn vs Goliad
- In Goliad, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.5% in Fairburn.
- In Goliad, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.7% compared to 12.3% in Fairburn.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Goliad at 21.3%, compared to 5.7% in Fairburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairburn hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 12.6% in Goliad.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.