Demographics details for Fairburn, GA vs Carthage, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairburn, GA vs Carthage, TX.
| Data | Fairburn | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,956 | 6,562 |
| Median Age | 30.9 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $67,245 | $42,788 |
| Married Families | 20.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 19% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Fairburn vs Carthage
- In Fairburn, the population is higher at 16,956, compared to 6,562 in Carthage.
- The median age in Carthage is higher at 36.4 years, compared to 30.9 years in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has a higher median income of $67,245 compared to $42,788 in Carthage.
- In Carthage, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 20.0% in Fairburn.
- The poverty level is higher in Carthage at 19%, compared to 15% in Fairburn.
- Carthage has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.2% in Fairburn.
Demographics
Demographics Fairburn vs Carthage provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairburn | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 73 | 12 |
| White | 12 | 59 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 17 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairburn vs Carthage
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairburn at 73% compared to 12% in Carthage.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Carthage at 59% compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- In Carthage, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Fairburn.
- Carthage has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Carthage at 11%, compared to 3% in Fairburn.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairburn and Carthage at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairburn | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 13.0% |
| Depression | 16.8% | 24.6% |
| Smoking | 15.6% | 19.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 17.2% |
| Obesity | 33.7% | 42.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairburn vs Carthage
- In Carthage, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 15.4% in Fairburn.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Carthage at 24.6% versus 16.8% in Fairburn.
- Carthage has a higher smoking rate at 19.6% compared to 15.6% in Fairburn.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Carthage at 17.2% compared to 15.0% in Fairburn.
- Carthage has higher obesity rates at 42.1% compared to 33.7% in Fairburn.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Carthage at 14.0% compared to 7.0% in Fairburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairburn | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (78) | 2.3% (148) |
| High School Diploma | 12.3% (2,082) | 10.7% (705) |
| Less than High School | 5.7% (961) | 20.5% (1,343) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.2% (3,591) | 9.1% (600) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairburn vs Carthage
- In Carthage, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 0.5% in Fairburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairburn hold a high school diploma at 12.3% compared to 10.7% in Carthage.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Carthage at 20.5%, compared to 5.7% in Fairburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairburn hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 9.1% in Carthage.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.