Demographics details for Fairburn, GA vs Ayden, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairburn, GA vs Ayden, NC.
| Data | Fairburn | Ayden |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,956 | 5,049 |
| Median Age | 30.9 years | 44.7 years |
| Median Income | $67,245 | $53,000 |
| Married Families | 20.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 17% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Fairburn vs Ayden
- In Fairburn, the population is higher at 16,956, compared to 5,049 in Ayden.
- The median age in Ayden is higher at 44.7 years, compared to 30.9 years in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has a higher median income of $67,245 compared to $53,000 in Ayden.
- In Ayden, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 20.0% in Fairburn.
- The poverty level is higher in Ayden at 17%, compared to 15% in Fairburn.
- Ayden has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.2% in Fairburn.
Demographics
Demographics Fairburn vs Ayden provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairburn | Ayden |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 73 | 37 |
| White | 12 | 48 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 12 | 11 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairburn vs Ayden
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairburn at 73% compared to 37% in Ayden.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ayden at 48% compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- Both Fairburn and Ayden have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fairburn at 12% compared to 11% in Ayden.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ayden at 4%, compared to 3% in Fairburn.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairburn and Ayden at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairburn | Ayden |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 12.8% |
| Depression | 16.8% | 22.2% |
| Smoking | 15.6% | 19.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 14.0% |
| Obesity | 33.7% | 43.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairburn vs Ayden
- In Ayden, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 15.4% in Fairburn.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Ayden at 22.2% versus 16.8% in Fairburn.
- Ayden has a higher smoking rate at 19.4% compared to 15.6% in Fairburn.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fairburn at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Ayden.
- Ayden has higher obesity rates at 43.3% compared to 33.7% in Fairburn.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ayden at 18.0% compared to 7.0% in Fairburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairburn | Ayden |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (78) | 3.1% (154) |
| High School Diploma | 12.3% (2,082) | 20.7% (1,046) |
| Less than High School | 5.7% (961) | 14.8% (748) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.2% (3,591) | 14.1% (712) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairburn vs Ayden
- In Ayden, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 0.5% in Fairburn.
- In Ayden, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.7% compared to 12.3% in Fairburn.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ayden at 14.8%, compared to 5.7% in Fairburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairburn hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 14.1% in Ayden.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.