Demographics details for Fairburn, GA vs Arlington, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairburn, GA vs Arlington, MA.
| Data | Fairburn | Arlington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,956 | 45,906 |
| Median Age | 30.9 years | 40.7 years |
| Median Income | $67,245 | $136,312 |
| Married Families | 20.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 3% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Fairburn vs Arlington
- The population in Arlington is higher at 45,906, compared to 16,956 in Fairburn.
- The median age in Arlington is higher at 40.7 years, compared to 30.9 years in Fairburn.
- Arlington has a higher median income of $136,312, compared to $67,245 in Fairburn.
- In Arlington, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 20.0% in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 3% in Arlington.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Fairburn and Arlington at 4.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Fairburn vs Arlington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairburn | Arlington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 73 | 3 |
| White | 12 | 73 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 13 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairburn vs Arlington
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairburn at 73% compared to 3% in Arlington.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Arlington at 73% compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- In Arlington, the Asian population stands at 13%, greater than 0% in Fairburn.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fairburn at 12% compared to 5% in Arlington.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Arlington at 6%, compared to 3% in Fairburn.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairburn and Arlington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairburn | Arlington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 12.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 7.1% |
| Depression | 16.8% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 15.6% | 7.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 19.4% |
| Obesity | 33.7% | 22.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairburn vs Arlington
- More residents in Fairburn report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 12.6% in Arlington.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Arlington at 20.1% versus 16.8% in Fairburn.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fairburn at 15.6% compared to 7.8% in Arlington.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Arlington at 19.4% compared to 15.0% in Fairburn.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fairburn at 33.7% compared to 22.3% in Arlington.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Arlington at 8.0% compared to 7.0% in Fairburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairburn | Arlington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (78) | 0.6% (256) |
| High School Diploma | 12.3% (2,082) | 6.8% (3,120) |
| Less than High School | 5.7% (961) | 3.8% (1,725) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.2% (3,591) | 54.6% (25,070) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairburn vs Arlington
- In Arlington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.5% in Fairburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairburn hold a high school diploma at 12.3% compared to 6.8% in Arlington.
- More residents in Fairburn have less than a high school education at 5.7% compared to 3.8% in Arlington.
- In Arlington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 54.6% compared to 21.2% in Fairburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.