Demographics details for Fairburn, GA vs Albany, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairburn, GA vs Albany, IN.
| Data | Fairburn | Albany |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,956 | 2,286 |
| Median Age | 30.9 years | 49.2 years |
| Median Income | $67,245 | $53,246 |
| Married Families | 20.0% | 55.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Fairburn vs Albany
- In Fairburn, the population is higher at 16,956, compared to 2,286 in Albany.
- The median age in Albany is higher at 49.2 years, compared to 30.9 years in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has a higher median income of $67,245 compared to $53,246 in Albany.
- In Albany, the percentage of married families is higher at 55.0%, compared to 20.0% in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Albany.
- The unemployment rate in Fairburn is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.2% in Albany.
Demographics
Demographics Fairburn vs Albany provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairburn | Albany |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 73 | Data is updating |
| White | 12 | 93 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairburn vs Albany
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairburn at 73% compared to 0% in Albany.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Albany at 93% compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- In Albany, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Fairburn.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fairburn at 12% compared to 3% in Albany.
- Both Fairburn and Albany have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 3%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairburn and Albany at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairburn | Albany |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 11.5% |
| Depression | 16.8% | 26.9% |
| Smoking | 15.6% | 20.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 17.4% |
| Obesity | 33.7% | 36.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 30.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairburn vs Albany
- In Albany, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 15.4% in Fairburn.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Albany at 26.9% versus 16.8% in Fairburn.
- Albany has a higher smoking rate at 20.1% compared to 15.6% in Fairburn.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Albany at 17.4% compared to 15.0% in Fairburn.
- Albany has higher obesity rates at 36.7% compared to 33.7% in Fairburn.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Albany at 30.0% compared to 7.0% in Fairburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairburn | Albany |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (78) | 0.5% (12) |
| High School Diploma | 12.3% (2,082) | 39.1% (893) |
| Less than High School | 5.7% (961) | 19.9% (456) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.2% (3,591) | 13.5% (308) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairburn vs Albany
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Fairburn and Albany at 0.5%.
- In Albany, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 39.1% compared to 12.3% in Fairburn.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Albany at 19.9%, compared to 5.7% in Fairburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairburn hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 13.5% in Albany.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.