Demographics details for Fairborn, OH vs Show low, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairborn, OH vs Show low, AZ.
| Data | Fairborn | Show low |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,977 | 12,056 |
| Median Age | 35.1 years | 43.6 years |
| Median Income | $53,783 | $57,406 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Fairborn vs Show low
- In Fairborn, the population is higher at 34,977, compared to 12,056 in Show low.
- The median age in Show low is higher at 43.6 years, compared to 35.1 years in Fairborn.
- Show low has a higher median income of $57,406, compared to $53,783 in Fairborn.
- In Show low, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 33.0% in Fairborn.
- The poverty level is higher in Show low at 10%, compared to 9% in Fairborn.
- The unemployment rate in Fairborn is higher at 5.1%, compared to 4.5% in Show low.
Demographics
Demographics Fairborn vs Show low provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairborn | Show low |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | Data is updating |
| White | 78 | 70 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Fairborn vs Show low
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairborn at 9% compared to 0% in Show low.
- Fairborn has a higher percentage of White residents at 78% compared to 70% in Show low.
- Both Fairborn and Show low have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Show low has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 4% in Fairborn.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Show low at 9%, compared to 8% in Fairborn.
- In Show low, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Fairborn.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairborn | Show low |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 11.4% |
| Depression | 23.4% | 20.7% |
| Smoking | 20.5% | 14.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 39.7% | 32.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairborn vs Show low
- More residents in Fairborn report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 17.1% in Show low.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fairborn at 23.4% compared to 20.7% in Show low.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fairborn at 20.5% compared to 14.6% in Show low.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Show low at 17.9% compared to 16.3% in Fairborn.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fairborn at 39.7% compared to 32.9% in Show low.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Show low at 17.0% compared to 16.0% in Fairborn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairborn | Show low |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (116) | 0.1% (12) |
| High School Diploma | 13.2% (4,620) | 14.3% (1,726) |
| Less than High School | 12.5% (4,382) | 7.0% (844) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.4% (6,782) | 19.1% (2,306) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairborn vs Show low
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairborn have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.1% in Show low.
- In Show low, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.3% compared to 13.2% in Fairborn.
- More residents in Fairborn have less than a high school education at 12.5% compared to 7.0% in Show low.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairborn hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 19.1% in Show low.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.