Demographics details for Fairborn, OH vs Newman, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairborn, OH vs Newman, CA.
Data | Fairborn | Newman |
---|---|---|
Population | 34,977 | 12,272 |
Median Age | 35.1 years | 34.2 years |
Median Income | $53,783 | $76,520 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 42.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 7.2 |
Population Comparison: Fairborn vs Newman
- In Fairborn, the population is higher at 34,977, compared to 12,272 in Newman.
- Residents in Fairborn have a higher median age of 35.1 years compared to 34.2 years in Newman.
- Newman has a higher median income of $76,520, compared to $53,783 in Fairborn.
- In Newman, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 33.0% in Fairborn.
- The poverty level is higher in Newman at 14%, compared to 9% in Fairborn.
- Newman has a higher unemployment rate at 7.2% compared to 5.1% in Fairborn.
Demographics
Demographics Fairborn vs Newman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fairborn | Newman |
---|---|---|
Black | 9 | 1 |
White | 78 | 3 |
Asian | 1 | 4 |
Hispanic | 4 | 73 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 19 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairborn vs Newman
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairborn at 9% compared to 1% in Newman.
- Fairborn has a higher percentage of White residents at 78% compared to 3% in Newman.
- In Newman, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Fairborn.
- Newman has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 73%, compared to 4% in Fairborn.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Newman at 19%, compared to 8% in Fairborn.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairborn and Newman at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fairborn | Newman |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 16.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 13.1% |
Depression | 23.4% | 20.5% |
Smoking | 20.5% | 14.4% |
Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 16.4% |
Obesity | 39.7% | 35.8% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairborn vs Newman
- More residents in Fairborn report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 16.9% in Newman.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fairborn at 23.4% compared to 20.5% in Newman.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fairborn at 20.5% compared to 14.4% in Newman.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Newman at 16.4% compared to 16.3% in Fairborn.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fairborn at 39.7% compared to 35.8% in Newman.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fairborn at 16.0% compared to 8.0% in Newman.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fairborn | Newman |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (116) | 1.4% (167) |
High School Diploma | 13.2% (4,620) | 18.3% (2,249) |
Less than High School | 12.5% (4,382) | 33.7% (4,138) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.4% (6,782) | 5.2% (635) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairborn vs Newman
- In Newman, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.3% in Fairborn.
- In Newman, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.3% compared to 13.2% in Fairborn.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Newman at 33.7%, compared to 12.5% in Fairborn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairborn hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 5.2% in Newman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.