Demographics details for Fairborn, OH vs Murray, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairborn, OH vs Murray, KY.
| Data | Fairborn | Murray |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,977 | 17,522 |
| Median Age | 35.1 years | 25.6 years |
| Median Income | $53,783 | $37,421 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 26.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Fairborn vs Murray
- In Fairborn, the population is higher at 34,977, compared to 17,522 in Murray.
- Residents in Fairborn have a higher median age of 35.1 years compared to 25.6 years in Murray.
- Fairborn has a higher median income of $53,783 compared to $37,421 in Murray.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fairborn at 33.0% compared to 26.0% in Murray.
- Fairborn has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 0% in Murray.
- The unemployment rate in Fairborn is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.8% in Murray.
Demographics
Demographics Fairborn vs Murray provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairborn | Murray |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 6 |
| White | 78 | 86 |
| Asian | 1 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairborn vs Murray
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairborn at 9% compared to 6% in Murray.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Murray at 86% compared to 78% in Fairborn.
- In Murray, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Fairborn.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fairborn at 4% compared to 2% in Murray.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fairborn at 8% compared to 3% in Murray.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairborn and Murray at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairborn | Murray |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 19.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 14.1% |
| Depression | 23.4% | 28.4% |
| Smoking | 20.5% | 22.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 14.0% |
| Obesity | 39.7% | 41.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairborn vs Murray
- In Murray, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 18.3% in Fairborn.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Murray at 28.4% versus 23.4% in Fairborn.
- Murray has a higher smoking rate at 22.0% compared to 20.5% in Fairborn.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fairborn at 16.3% compared to 14.0% in Murray.
- Murray has higher obesity rates at 41.3% compared to 39.7% in Fairborn.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Fairborn and Murray at 16.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairborn | Murray |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (116) | 0.9% (166) |
| High School Diploma | 13.2% (4,620) | 10.5% (1,833) |
| Less than High School | 12.5% (4,382) | 8.7% (1,531) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.4% (6,782) | 18.2% (3,185) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairborn vs Murray
- In Murray, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.3% in Fairborn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairborn hold a high school diploma at 13.2% compared to 10.5% in Murray.
- More residents in Fairborn have less than a high school education at 12.5% compared to 8.7% in Murray.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairborn hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 18.2% in Murray.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.