Demographics details for Fairborn, OH vs Lincroft, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairborn, OH vs Lincroft, NJ.
| Data | Fairborn | Lincroft |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,977 | 6,793 |
| Median Age | 35.1 years | 44.4 years |
| Median Income | $53,783 | $186,875 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 52.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Fairborn vs Lincroft
- In Fairborn, the population is higher at 34,977, compared to 6,793 in Lincroft.
- The median age in Lincroft is higher at 44.4 years, compared to 35.1 years in Fairborn.
- Lincroft has a higher median income of $186,875, compared to $53,783 in Fairborn.
- In Lincroft, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 33.0% in Fairborn.
- Fairborn has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 0% in Lincroft.
- The unemployment rate in Fairborn is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.2% in Lincroft.
Demographics
Demographics Fairborn vs Lincroft provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairborn | Lincroft |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | Data is updating |
| White | 78 | 83 |
| Asian | 1 | 9 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairborn vs Lincroft
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairborn at 9% compared to 0% in Lincroft.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lincroft at 83% compared to 78% in Fairborn.
- In Lincroft, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 1% in Fairborn.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fairborn at 4% compared to 3% in Lincroft.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fairborn at 8% compared to 5% in Lincroft.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairborn and Lincroft at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairborn | Lincroft |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 13.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 7.6% |
| Depression | 23.4% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 20.5% | 10.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 19.9% |
| Obesity | 39.7% | 24.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairborn vs Lincroft
- More residents in Fairborn report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 13.7% in Lincroft.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fairborn at 23.4% compared to 20.1% in Lincroft.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fairborn at 20.5% compared to 10.5% in Lincroft.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lincroft at 19.9% compared to 16.3% in Fairborn.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fairborn at 39.7% compared to 24.9% in Lincroft.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fairborn at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Lincroft.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairborn | Lincroft |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (116) | 0.1% (6) |
| High School Diploma | 13.2% (4,620) | 10.2% (696) |
| Less than High School | 12.5% (4,382) | 1.2% (83) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.4% (6,782) | 44.6% (3,033) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairborn vs Lincroft
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairborn have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.1% in Lincroft.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairborn hold a high school diploma at 13.2% compared to 10.2% in Lincroft.
- More residents in Fairborn have less than a high school education at 12.5% compared to 1.2% in Lincroft.
- In Lincroft, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 44.6% compared to 19.4% in Fairborn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.