Demographics details for Fairborn, OH vs Blakely, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairborn, OH vs Blakely, GA.
| Data | Fairborn | Blakely |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,977 | 5,238 |
| Median Age | 35.1 years | 31.5 years |
| Median Income | $53,783 | $43,008 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 26% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Fairborn vs Blakely
- In Fairborn, the population is higher at 34,977, compared to 5,238 in Blakely.
- Residents in Fairborn have a higher median age of 35.1 years compared to 31.5 years in Blakely.
- Fairborn has a higher median income of $53,783 compared to $43,008 in Blakely.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fairborn at 33.0% compared to 27.0% in Blakely.
- The poverty level is higher in Blakely at 26%, compared to 9% in Fairborn.
- The unemployment rate in Fairborn is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.7% in Blakely.
Demographics
Demographics Fairborn vs Blakely provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairborn | Blakely |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 77 |
| White | 78 | 22 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairborn vs Blakely
- In Blakely, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 77% compared to 9% in Fairborn.
- Fairborn has a higher percentage of White residents at 78% compared to 22% in Blakely.
- The Asian population is larger in Fairborn at 1% compared to 0% in Blakely.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fairborn at 4% compared to 0% in Blakely.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fairborn at 8% compared to 1% in Blakely.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairborn and Blakely at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairborn | Blakely |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 20.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 15.6% |
| Depression | 23.4% | 21.3% |
| Smoking | 20.5% | 23.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 12.4% |
| Obesity | 39.7% | 44.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairborn vs Blakely
- In Blakely, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 18.3% in Fairborn.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fairborn at 23.4% compared to 21.3% in Blakely.
- Blakely has a higher smoking rate at 23.4% compared to 20.5% in Fairborn.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fairborn at 16.3% compared to 12.4% in Blakely.
- Blakely has higher obesity rates at 44.6% compared to 39.7% in Fairborn.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fairborn at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Blakely.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairborn | Blakely |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (116) | 0.7% (35) |
| High School Diploma | 13.2% (4,620) | 18.8% (985) |
| Less than High School | 12.5% (4,382) | 14.5% (759) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.4% (6,782) | 6.1% (320) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairborn vs Blakely
- In Blakely, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.3% in Fairborn.
- In Blakely, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.8% compared to 13.2% in Fairborn.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Blakely at 14.5%, compared to 12.5% in Fairborn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairborn hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 6.1% in Blakely.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.