Demographics details for Fairborn, OH vs Beaverton, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairborn, OH vs Beaverton, MI.
| Data | Fairborn | Beaverton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,977 | 1,156 |
| Median Age | 35.1 years | 39.6 years |
| Median Income | $53,783 | $31,985 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Fairborn vs Beaverton
- In Fairborn, the population is higher at 34,977, compared to 1,156 in Beaverton.
- The median age in Beaverton is higher at 39.6 years, compared to 35.1 years in Fairborn.
- Fairborn has a higher median income of $53,783 compared to $31,985 in Beaverton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fairborn at 33.0% compared to 30.0% in Beaverton.
- The poverty level is higher in Beaverton at 12%, compared to 9% in Fairborn.
- The unemployment rate in Fairborn is higher at 5.1%, compared to 4.5% in Beaverton.
Demographics
Demographics Fairborn vs Beaverton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairborn | Beaverton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 1 |
| White | 78 | 93 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairborn vs Beaverton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairborn at 9% compared to 1% in Beaverton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Beaverton at 93% compared to 78% in Fairborn.
- The Asian population is larger in Fairborn at 1% compared to 0% in Beaverton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fairborn at 4% compared to 1% in Beaverton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fairborn at 8% compared to 5% in Beaverton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairborn and Beaverton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairborn | Beaverton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 20.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 23.4% | 28.3% |
| Smoking | 20.5% | 24.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 18.0% |
| Obesity | 39.7% | 39.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 27.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairborn vs Beaverton
- In Beaverton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 18.3% in Fairborn.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Beaverton at 28.3% versus 23.4% in Fairborn.
- Beaverton has a higher smoking rate at 24.8% compared to 20.5% in Fairborn.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Beaverton at 18.0% compared to 16.3% in Fairborn.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fairborn at 39.7% compared to 39.3% in Beaverton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Beaverton at 27.0% compared to 16.0% in Fairborn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairborn | Beaverton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (116) | 1.0% (11) |
| High School Diploma | 13.2% (4,620) | 25.3% (293) |
| Less than High School | 12.5% (4,382) | 14.0% (162) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.4% (6,782) | 8.0% (93) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairborn vs Beaverton
- In Beaverton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.3% in Fairborn.
- In Beaverton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.3% compared to 13.2% in Fairborn.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Beaverton at 14.0%, compared to 12.5% in Fairborn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairborn hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 8.0% in Beaverton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.