Demographics details for Fair oaks, CA vs Whiting, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fair oaks, CA vs Whiting, KS.
| Data | Fair oaks | Whiting |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 32,754 | 195 |
| Median Age | 45.7 years | 33.7 years |
| Median Income | $112,138 | $52,000 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | Data is updating |
Population Comparison: Fair oaks vs Whiting
- In Fair oaks, the population is higher at 32,754, compared to 195 in Whiting.
- Residents in Fair oaks have a higher median age of 45.7 years compared to 33.7 years in Whiting.
- Fair oaks has a higher median income of $112,138 compared to $52,000 in Whiting.
- In Whiting, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 45.0% in Fair oaks.
- Fair oaks has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 0% in Whiting.
- The unemployment rate in Fair oaks is higher at 4.5%, compared to 0.0% in Whiting.
Demographics
Demographics Fair oaks vs Whiting provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fair oaks | Whiting |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 68 | 87 |
| Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 14 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 11 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fair oaks vs Whiting
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fair oaks at 2% compared to 0% in Whiting.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Whiting at 87% compared to 68% in Fair oaks.
- The Asian population is larger in Fair oaks at 5% compared to 0% in Whiting.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fair oaks at 14% compared to 2% in Whiting.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Whiting at 11%, compared to 10% in Fair oaks.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fair oaks at 1% compared to 0% in Whiting.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fair oaks | Whiting |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 16.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.3% | 9.9% |
| Depression | 20.3% | 22.9% |
| Smoking | 10.6% | 17.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 19.3% |
| Obesity | 29.9% | 39.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fair oaks vs Whiting
- In Whiting, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.1% compared to 15.6% in Fair oaks.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Whiting at 22.9% versus 20.3% in Fair oaks.
- Whiting has a higher smoking rate at 17.9% compared to 10.6% in Fair oaks.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Whiting at 19.3% compared to 17.8% in Fair oaks.
- Whiting has higher obesity rates at 39.3% compared to 29.9% in Fair oaks.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Whiting at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Fair oaks.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fair oaks | Whiting |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (312) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 9.5% (3,112) | 28.7% (56) |
| Less than High School | 4.9% (1,601) | 9.2% (18) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.4% (11,579) | 14.9% (29) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fair oaks vs Whiting
- A higher percentage of residents in Fair oaks have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Whiting.
- In Whiting, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.7% compared to 9.5% in Fair oaks.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Whiting at 9.2%, compared to 4.9% in Fair oaks.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fair oaks hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.4% compared to 14.9% in Whiting.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.