Demographics details for Fair oaks, CA vs Leesville, LA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fair oaks, CA vs Leesville, LA.
Data | Fair oaks | Leesville |
---|---|---|
Population | 32,754 | 6,612 |
Median Age | 45.7 years | 34.0 years |
Median Income | $112,138 | $46,000 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 45.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Fair oaks vs Leesville
- In Fair oaks, the population is higher at 32,754, compared to 6,612 in Leesville.
- Residents in Fair oaks have a higher median age of 45.7 years compared to 34.0 years in Leesville.
- Fair oaks has a higher median income of $112,138 compared to $46,000 in Leesville.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Fair oaks and Leesville at 45.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Leesville at 15%, compared to 6% in Fair oaks.
- The unemployment rate in Fair oaks is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.0% in Leesville.
Demographics
Demographics Fair oaks vs Leesville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fair oaks | Leesville |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 30 |
White | 68 | 60 |
Asian | 5 | 5 |
Hispanic | 14 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 10 | 2 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fair oaks vs Leesville
- In Leesville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 30% compared to 2% in Fair oaks.
- Fair oaks has a higher percentage of White residents at 68% compared to 60% in Leesville.
- Both Fair oaks and Leesville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 5%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fair oaks at 14% compared to 3% in Leesville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fair oaks at 10% compared to 2% in Leesville.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fair oaks at 1% compared to 0% in Leesville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fair oaks | Leesville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.3% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 20.3% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 10.6% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 17.8% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 29.9% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fair oaks vs Leesville
- More residents in Fair oaks report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 0.0% in Leesville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fair oaks at 20.3% compared to 0.0% in Leesville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fair oaks at 10.6% compared to 0.0% in Leesville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fair oaks at 17.8% compared to 0.0% in Leesville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fair oaks at 29.9% compared to 0.0% in Leesville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fair oaks at 11.0% compared to 0.0% in Leesville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fair oaks | Leesville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (312) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 9.5% (3,112) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 4.9% (1,601) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.4% (11,579) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fair oaks vs Leesville
- A higher percentage of residents in Fair oaks have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Leesville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fair oaks hold a high school diploma at 9.5% compared to 0.0% in Leesville.
- More residents in Fair oaks have less than a high school education at 4.9% compared to 0.0% in Leesville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fair oaks hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.4% compared to 0.0% in Leesville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.