Demographics details for Fair oaks, CA vs Heppner, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fair oaks, CA vs Heppner, OR.
| Data | Fair oaks | Heppner |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 32,754 | 1,172 |
| Median Age | 45.7 years | 39.1 years |
| Median Income | $112,138 | $46,708 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.7 |
Population Comparison: Fair oaks vs Heppner
- In Fair oaks, the population is higher at 32,754, compared to 1,172 in Heppner.
- Residents in Fair oaks have a higher median age of 45.7 years compared to 39.1 years in Heppner.
- Fair oaks has a higher median income of $112,138 compared to $46,708 in Heppner.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fair oaks at 45.0% compared to 43.0% in Heppner.
- The poverty level is higher in Heppner at 10%, compared to 6% in Fair oaks.
- Heppner has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 4.5% in Fair oaks.
Demographics
Demographics Fair oaks vs Heppner provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fair oaks | Heppner |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 1 |
| White | 68 | 86 |
| Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 14 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 7 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fair oaks vs Heppner
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fair oaks at 2% compared to 1% in Heppner.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Heppner at 86% compared to 68% in Fair oaks.
- The Asian population is larger in Fair oaks at 5% compared to 0% in Heppner.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fair oaks at 14% compared to 6% in Heppner.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fair oaks at 10% compared to 7% in Heppner.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fair oaks at 1% compared to 0% in Heppner.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fair oaks | Heppner |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 18.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.3% | 11.2% |
| Depression | 20.3% | 27.6% |
| Smoking | 10.6% | 16.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 29.9% | 34.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 35.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fair oaks vs Heppner
- In Heppner, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 15.6% in Fair oaks.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Heppner at 27.6% versus 20.3% in Fair oaks.
- Heppner has a higher smoking rate at 16.2% compared to 10.6% in Fair oaks.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Heppner at 18.2% compared to 17.8% in Fair oaks.
- Heppner has higher obesity rates at 34.4% compared to 29.9% in Fair oaks.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Heppner at 35.0% compared to 11.0% in Fair oaks.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fair oaks | Heppner |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (312) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 9.5% (3,112) | 22.0% (258) |
| Less than High School | 4.9% (1,601) | 9.4% (110) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.4% (11,579) | 9.8% (115) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fair oaks vs Heppner
- A higher percentage of residents in Fair oaks have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Heppner.
- In Heppner, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.0% compared to 9.5% in Fair oaks.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Heppner at 9.4%, compared to 4.9% in Fair oaks.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fair oaks hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.4% compared to 9.8% in Heppner.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.