Demographics details for Fair oaks, CA vs Fairfield, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fair oaks, CA vs Fairfield, AL.
| Data | Fair oaks | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 32,754 | 9,690 |
| Median Age | 45.7 years | 30.7 years |
| Median Income | $112,138 | $45,646 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 30% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Fair oaks vs Fairfield
- In Fair oaks, the population is higher at 32,754, compared to 9,690 in Fairfield.
- Residents in Fair oaks have a higher median age of 45.7 years compared to 30.7 years in Fairfield.
- Fair oaks has a higher median income of $112,138 compared to $45,646 in Fairfield.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fair oaks at 45.0% compared to 20.0% in Fairfield.
- The poverty level is higher in Fairfield at 30%, compared to 6% in Fair oaks.
- Fairfield has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.5% in Fair oaks.
Demographics
Demographics Fair oaks vs Fairfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fair oaks | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 95 |
| White | 68 | 3 |
| Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 14 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 2 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fair oaks vs Fairfield
- In Fairfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 95% compared to 2% in Fair oaks.
- Fair oaks has a higher percentage of White residents at 68% compared to 3% in Fairfield.
- The Asian population is larger in Fair oaks at 5% compared to 0% in Fairfield.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fair oaks at 14% compared to 0% in Fairfield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fair oaks at 10% compared to 2% in Fairfield.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fair oaks at 1% compared to 0% in Fairfield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fair oaks | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 19.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.3% | 14.2% |
| Depression | 20.3% | 19.6% |
| Smoking | 10.6% | 20.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 11.7% |
| Obesity | 29.9% | 48.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fair oaks vs Fairfield
- In Fairfield, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 15.6% in Fair oaks.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fair oaks at 20.3% compared to 19.6% in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has a higher smoking rate at 20.6% compared to 10.6% in Fair oaks.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fair oaks at 17.8% compared to 11.7% in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has higher obesity rates at 48.1% compared to 29.9% in Fair oaks.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fairfield at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Fair oaks.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fair oaks | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (312) | 0.5% (53) |
| High School Diploma | 9.5% (3,112) | 22.3% (2,159) |
| Less than High School | 4.9% (1,601) | 3.1% (302) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.4% (11,579) | 14.8% (1,437) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fair oaks vs Fairfield
- A higher percentage of residents in Fair oaks have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.5% in Fairfield.
- In Fairfield, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.3% compared to 9.5% in Fair oaks.
- More residents in Fair oaks have less than a high school education at 4.9% compared to 3.1% in Fairfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fair oaks hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.4% compared to 14.8% in Fairfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.