Demographics details for Fair oaks, CA vs Cross city, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fair oaks, CA vs Cross city, FL.
| Data | Fair oaks | Cross city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 32,754 | 1,754 |
| Median Age | 45.7 years | 40.2 years |
| Median Income | $112,138 | $44,500 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Fair oaks vs Cross city
- In Fair oaks, the population is higher at 32,754, compared to 1,754 in Cross city.
- Residents in Fair oaks have a higher median age of 45.7 years compared to 40.2 years in Cross city.
- Fair oaks has a higher median income of $112,138 compared to $44,500 in Cross city.
- In Cross city, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 45.0% in Fair oaks.
- The poverty level is higher in Cross city at 18%, compared to 6% in Fair oaks.
- The unemployment rate in Fair oaks is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Cross city.
Demographics
Demographics Fair oaks vs Cross city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fair oaks | Cross city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 20 |
| White | 68 | 61 |
| Asian | 5 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 14 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 8 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fair oaks vs Cross city
- In Cross city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 20% compared to 2% in Fair oaks.
- Fair oaks has a higher percentage of White residents at 68% compared to 61% in Cross city.
- The Asian population is larger in Fair oaks at 5% compared to 2% in Cross city.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fair oaks at 14% compared to 9% in Cross city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fair oaks at 10% compared to 8% in Cross city.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fair oaks at 1% compared to 0% in Cross city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fair oaks | Cross city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 20.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.3% | 15.8% |
| Depression | 20.3% | 23.8% |
| Smoking | 10.6% | 29.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 14.8% |
| Obesity | 29.9% | 40.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 32.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fair oaks vs Cross city
- In Cross city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 15.6% in Fair oaks.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cross city at 23.8% versus 20.3% in Fair oaks.
- Cross city has a higher smoking rate at 29.1% compared to 10.6% in Fair oaks.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fair oaks at 17.8% compared to 14.8% in Cross city.
- Cross city has higher obesity rates at 40.8% compared to 29.9% in Fair oaks.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cross city at 32.0% compared to 11.0% in Fair oaks.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fair oaks | Cross city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (312) | 0.9% (15) |
| High School Diploma | 9.5% (3,112) | 39.2% (688) |
| Less than High School | 4.9% (1,601) | 11.7% (205) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.4% (11,579) | 7.8% (136) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fair oaks vs Cross city
- A higher percentage of residents in Fair oaks have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.9% in Cross city.
- In Cross city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 39.2% compared to 9.5% in Fair oaks.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cross city at 11.7%, compared to 4.9% in Fair oaks.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fair oaks hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.4% compared to 7.8% in Cross city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.