Demographics details for Fair oaks, CA vs Carthage, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fair oaks, CA vs Carthage, TX.
| Data | Fair oaks | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 32,754 | 6,562 |
| Median Age | 45.7 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $112,138 | $42,788 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 19% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Fair oaks vs Carthage
- In Fair oaks, the population is higher at 32,754, compared to 6,562 in Carthage.
- Residents in Fair oaks have a higher median age of 45.7 years compared to 36.4 years in Carthage.
- Fair oaks has a higher median income of $112,138 compared to $42,788 in Carthage.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fair oaks at 45.0% compared to 36.0% in Carthage.
- The poverty level is higher in Carthage at 19%, compared to 6% in Fair oaks.
- Carthage has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.5% in Fair oaks.
Demographics
Demographics Fair oaks vs Carthage provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fair oaks | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 12 |
| White | 68 | 59 |
| Asian | 5 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 14 | 17 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 11 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fair oaks vs Carthage
- In Carthage, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 2% in Fair oaks.
- Fair oaks has a higher percentage of White residents at 68% compared to 59% in Carthage.
- The Asian population is larger in Fair oaks at 5% compared to 1% in Carthage.
- Carthage has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 14% in Fair oaks.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Carthage at 11%, compared to 10% in Fair oaks.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fair oaks at 1% compared to 0% in Carthage.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fair oaks | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.3% | 13.0% |
| Depression | 20.3% | 24.6% |
| Smoking | 10.6% | 19.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 17.2% |
| Obesity | 29.9% | 42.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fair oaks vs Carthage
- In Carthage, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 15.6% in Fair oaks.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Carthage at 24.6% versus 20.3% in Fair oaks.
- Carthage has a higher smoking rate at 19.6% compared to 10.6% in Fair oaks.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fair oaks at 17.8% compared to 17.2% in Carthage.
- Carthage has higher obesity rates at 42.1% compared to 29.9% in Fair oaks.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Carthage at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Fair oaks.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fair oaks | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (312) | 2.3% (148) |
| High School Diploma | 9.5% (3,112) | 10.7% (705) |
| Less than High School | 4.9% (1,601) | 20.5% (1,343) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.4% (11,579) | 9.1% (600) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fair oaks vs Carthage
- In Carthage, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 1.0% in Fair oaks.
- In Carthage, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 10.7% compared to 9.5% in Fair oaks.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Carthage at 20.5%, compared to 4.9% in Fair oaks.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fair oaks hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.4% compared to 9.1% in Carthage.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.