Demographics details for Evarts, KY vs Hancock, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Evarts, KY vs Hancock, MN.
| Data | Evarts | Hancock |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 834 | 857 |
| Median Age | 40.3 years | 35.9 years |
| Median Income | $32,222 | $67,019 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Evarts vs Hancock
- The population in Hancock is higher at 857, compared to 834 in Evarts.
- Residents in Evarts have a higher median age of 40.3 years compared to 35.9 years in Hancock.
- Hancock has a higher median income of $67,019, compared to $32,222 in Evarts.
- In Hancock, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 39.0% in Evarts.
- Evarts has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 5% in Hancock.
- The unemployment rate in Evarts is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.5% in Hancock.
Demographics
Demographics Evarts vs Hancock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Evarts | Hancock |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 1 |
| White | 93 | 87 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Evarts vs Hancock
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Evarts at 2% compared to 1% in Hancock.
- Evarts has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 87% in Hancock.
- In Hancock, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Evarts.
- Hancock has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 2% in Evarts.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hancock at 4%, compared to 3% in Evarts.
- In Hancock, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Evarts.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Evarts | Hancock |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 25.3% | 14.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 22.3% | 9.2% |
| Depression | 32.1% | 24.1% |
| Smoking | 36.5% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.5% | 20.9% |
| Obesity | 47.5% | 33.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 30.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Evarts vs Hancock
- More residents in Evarts report poor mental health at 25.3% compared to 14.8% in Hancock.
- Depression is more prevalent in Evarts at 32.1% compared to 24.1% in Hancock.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Evarts at 36.5% compared to 17.2% in Hancock.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Hancock at 20.9% compared to 12.5% in Evarts.
- Obesity rates are higher in Evarts at 47.5% compared to 33.6% in Hancock.
- Disability percentages are higher in Evarts at 30.0% compared to 6.0% in Hancock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Evarts | Hancock |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (14) | 0.5% (4) |
| High School Diploma | 22.8% (190) | 20.9% (179) |
| Less than High School | 45.6% (380) | 6.0% (51) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.3% (61) | 7.2% (62) |
Education Levels Comparison: Evarts vs Hancock
- A higher percentage of residents in Evarts have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.5% in Hancock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Evarts hold a high school diploma at 22.8% compared to 20.9% in Hancock.
- More residents in Evarts have less than a high school education at 45.6% compared to 6.0% in Hancock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Evarts hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.3% compared to 7.2% in Hancock.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.