Demographics details for Evart, MI vs Palmer, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Evart, MI vs Palmer, NE.
| Data | Evart | Palmer |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,772 | 439 |
| Median Age | 36.7 years | 41.3 years |
| Median Income | $37,344 | $51,429 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Evart vs Palmer
- In Evart, the population is higher at 1,772, compared to 439 in Palmer.
- The median age in Palmer is higher at 41.3 years, compared to 36.7 years in Evart.
- Palmer has a higher median income of $51,429, compared to $37,344 in Evart.
- In Palmer, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 32.0% in Evart.
- Evart has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Palmer.
- The unemployment rate in Evart is higher at 4.5%, compared to 2.5% in Palmer.
Demographics
Demographics Evart vs Palmer provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Evart | Palmer |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 93 | 94 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Evart vs Palmer
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Evart and Palmer at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Palmer at 94% compared to 93% in Evart.
- In Palmer, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Evart.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Evart at 3% compared to 2% in Palmer.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Evart at 4% compared to 3% in Palmer.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Evart and Palmer at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Evart | Palmer |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.5% | 14.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.3% | 9.6% |
| Depression | 28.6% | 17.9% |
| Smoking | 25.5% | 17.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 20.9% |
| Obesity | 39.3% | 43.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Evart vs Palmer
- More residents in Evart report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 14.0% in Palmer.
- Depression is more prevalent in Evart at 28.6% compared to 17.9% in Palmer.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Evart at 25.5% compared to 17.1% in Palmer.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Palmer at 20.9% compared to 16.7% in Evart.
- Palmer has higher obesity rates at 43.8% compared to 39.3% in Evart.
- Disability percentages are higher in Evart at 22.0% compared to 18.0% in Palmer.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Evart | Palmer |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (13) | 0.5% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 21.4% (379) | 25.5% (112) |
| Less than High School | 19.6% (348) | 4.1% (18) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.1% (162) | 10.3% (45) |
Education Levels Comparison: Evart vs Palmer
- A higher percentage of residents in Evart have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Palmer.
- In Palmer, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.5% compared to 21.4% in Evart.
- More residents in Evart have less than a high school education at 19.6% compared to 4.1% in Palmer.
- In Palmer, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.3% compared to 9.1% in Evart.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.