Demographics details for Evansville, IN vs Carthage, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Evansville, IN vs Carthage, MS.
Data | Evansville | Carthage |
---|---|---|
Population | 115,749 | 4,813 |
Median Age | 38.1 years | 36.4 years |
Median Income | $49,853 | $47,722 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 23.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Evansville vs Carthage
- In Evansville, the population is higher at 115,749, compared to 4,813 in Carthage.
- Residents in Evansville have a higher median age of 38.1 years compared to 36.4 years in Carthage.
- Evansville has a higher median income of $49,853 compared to $47,722 in Carthage.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Evansville at 33.0% compared to 23.0% in Carthage.
- The poverty level is higher in Carthage at 15%, compared to 13% in Evansville.
- The unemployment rate in Evansville is higher at 4.4%, compared to 4.2% in Carthage.
Demographics
Demographics Evansville vs Carthage provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Evansville | Carthage |
---|---|---|
Black | 14 | 45 |
White | 76 | 36 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 4 | 18 |
Two or More Races | 5 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Evansville vs Carthage
- In Carthage, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 45% compared to 14% in Evansville.
- Evansville has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 36% in Carthage.
- The Asian population is larger in Evansville at 1% compared to 0% in Carthage.
- Carthage has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 4% in Evansville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Evansville at 5% compared to 0% in Carthage.
- In Carthage, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Evansville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Evansville | Carthage |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.5% | 19.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.8% | 15.8% |
Depression | 27.6% | 21.6% |
Smoking | 23.2% | 25.3% |
Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 12.5% |
Obesity | 44.3% | 46.5% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Evansville vs Carthage
- More residents in Evansville report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 19.0% in Carthage.
- Depression is more prevalent in Evansville at 27.6% compared to 21.6% in Carthage.
- Carthage has a higher smoking rate at 25.3% compared to 23.2% in Evansville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Evansville at 15.9% compared to 12.5% in Carthage.
- Carthage has higher obesity rates at 46.5% compared to 44.3% in Evansville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Carthage at 23.0% compared to 18.0% in Evansville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Evansville | Carthage |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (939) | 3.0% (145) |
High School Diploma | 20.0% (23,144) | 16.7% (806) |
Less than High School | 13.6% (15,701) | 16.9% (811) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.7% (18,125) | 12.1% (583) |
Education Levels Comparison: Evansville vs Carthage
- In Carthage, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.8% in Evansville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Evansville hold a high school diploma at 20.0% compared to 16.7% in Carthage.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Carthage at 16.9%, compared to 13.6% in Evansville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Evansville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.7% compared to 12.1% in Carthage.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.