Demographics details for Eutaw, AL vs Mount olive, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Eutaw, AL vs Mount olive, MS.
| Data | Eutaw | Mount olive |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,803 | 878 |
| Median Age | 38.4 years | 31.7 years |
| Median Income | $33,371 | $53,947 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 49.0% |
| Poverty Level | 24% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: Eutaw vs Mount olive
- In Eutaw, the population is higher at 2,803, compared to 878 in Mount olive.
- Residents in Eutaw have a higher median age of 38.4 years compared to 31.7 years in Mount olive.
- Mount olive has a higher median income of $53,947, compared to $33,371 in Eutaw.
- In Mount olive, the percentage of married families is higher at 49.0%, compared to 25.0% in Eutaw.
- Eutaw has a higher poverty level at 24% compared to 18% in Mount olive.
- Mount olive has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 3.2% in Eutaw.
Demographics
Demographics Eutaw vs Mount olive provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Eutaw | Mount olive |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 77 | 120 |
| White | 22 | 145 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 1 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Eutaw vs Mount olive
- In Mount olive, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 120% compared to 77% in Eutaw.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mount olive at 145% compared to 22% in Eutaw.
- In Mount olive, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Eutaw.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Eutaw at 1% compared to 0% in Mount olive.
- Both Eutaw and Mount olive have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 0%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Eutaw and Mount olive at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Eutaw | Mount olive |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 22.5% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 18.0% | 13.3% |
| Depression | 21.3% | 21.5% |
| Smoking | 27.0% | 21.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 10.7% | 13.0% |
| Obesity | 51.6% | 43.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 27.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Eutaw vs Mount olive
- More residents in Eutaw report poor mental health at 22.5% compared to 17.8% in Mount olive.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mount olive at 21.5% versus 21.3% in Eutaw.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Eutaw at 27.0% compared to 21.3% in Mount olive.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mount olive at 13.0% compared to 10.7% in Eutaw.
- Obesity rates are higher in Eutaw at 51.6% compared to 43.6% in Mount olive.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mount olive at 27.0% compared to 20.0% in Eutaw.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Eutaw | Mount olive |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.3% (20) |
| High School Diploma | 15.6% (438) | 23.9% (210) |
| Less than High School | 16.6% (464) | 14.9% (131) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.8% (470) | 13.0% (114) |
Education Levels Comparison: Eutaw vs Mount olive
- In Mount olive, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 0.0% in Eutaw.
- In Mount olive, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.9% compared to 15.6% in Eutaw.
- More residents in Eutaw have less than a high school education at 16.6% compared to 14.9% in Mount olive.
- A higher percentage of residents in Eutaw hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.8% compared to 13.0% in Mount olive.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.