Demographics details for Eutaw, AL vs Kings mountain, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Eutaw, AL vs Kings mountain, NC.
Data | Eutaw | Kings mountain |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,803 | 11,638 |
Median Age | 38.4 years | 41.5 years |
Median Income | $33,371 | $45,301 |
Married Families | 25.0% | 24.0% |
Poverty Level | 24% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Eutaw vs Kings mountain
- The population in Kings mountain is higher at 11,638, compared to 2,803 in Eutaw.
- The median age in Kings mountain is higher at 41.5 years, compared to 38.4 years in Eutaw.
- Kings mountain has a higher median income of $45,301, compared to $33,371 in Eutaw.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Eutaw at 25.0% compared to 24.0% in Kings mountain.
- Eutaw has a higher poverty level at 24% compared to 11% in Kings mountain.
- Kings mountain has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.2% in Eutaw.
Demographics
Demographics Eutaw vs Kings mountain provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Eutaw | Kings mountain |
---|---|---|
Black | 77 | 25 |
White | 22 | 68 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | 1 | 2 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Eutaw vs Kings mountain
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Eutaw at 77% compared to 25% in Kings mountain.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Kings mountain at 68% compared to 22% in Eutaw.
- In Kings mountain, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Eutaw.
- Kings mountain has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 1% in Eutaw.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Kings mountain at 3%, compared to 0% in Eutaw.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Eutaw and Kings mountain at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Eutaw | Kings mountain |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 22.5% | 18.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 18.0% | 13.1% |
Depression | 21.3% | 25.7% |
Smoking | 27.0% | 20.9% |
Binge Drinking | 10.7% | 16.3% |
Obesity | 51.6% | 38.0% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Eutaw vs Kings mountain
- More residents in Eutaw report poor mental health at 22.5% compared to 18.3% in Kings mountain.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Kings mountain at 25.7% versus 21.3% in Eutaw.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Eutaw at 27.0% compared to 20.9% in Kings mountain.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Kings mountain at 16.3% compared to 10.7% in Eutaw.
- Obesity rates are higher in Eutaw at 51.6% compared to 38.0% in Kings mountain.
- Disability percentages are higher in Eutaw at 20.0% compared to 14.0% in Kings mountain.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Eutaw | Kings mountain |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.4% (43) |
High School Diploma | 15.6% (438) | 21.7% (2,528) |
Less than High School | 16.6% (464) | 17.8% (2,071) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.8% (470) | 11.6% (1,353) |
Education Levels Comparison: Eutaw vs Kings mountain
- In Kings mountain, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Eutaw.
- In Kings mountain, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.7% compared to 15.6% in Eutaw.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Kings mountain at 17.8%, compared to 16.6% in Eutaw.
- A higher percentage of residents in Eutaw hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.8% compared to 11.6% in Kings mountain.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.