Demographics details for Eutaw, AL vs Garfield, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Eutaw, AL vs Garfield, WA.
Data | Eutaw | Garfield |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,803 | 2,363 |
Median Age | 38.4 years | 49.9 years |
Median Income | $33,371 | $57,958 |
Married Families | 25.0% | 57.0% |
Poverty Level | 24% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.4 |
Population Comparison: Eutaw vs Garfield
- In Eutaw, the population is higher at 2,803, compared to 2,363 in Garfield.
- The median age in Garfield is higher at 49.9 years, compared to 38.4 years in Eutaw.
- Garfield has a higher median income of $57,958, compared to $33,371 in Eutaw.
- In Garfield, the percentage of married families is higher at 57.0%, compared to 25.0% in Eutaw.
- Eutaw has a higher poverty level at 24% compared to 0% in Garfield.
- Garfield has a higher unemployment rate at 4.4% compared to 3.2% in Eutaw.
Demographics
Demographics Eutaw vs Garfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Eutaw | Garfield |
---|---|---|
Black | 77 | 1 |
White | 22 | 88 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 1 | 4 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Eutaw vs Garfield
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Eutaw at 77% compared to 1% in Garfield.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Garfield at 88% compared to 22% in Eutaw.
- In Garfield, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Eutaw.
- Garfield has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 1% in Eutaw.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Garfield at 6%, compared to 0% in Eutaw.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Eutaw and Garfield at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Eutaw | Garfield |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 22.5% | 17.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 18.0% | 11.0% |
Depression | 21.3% | 28.7% |
Smoking | 27.0% | 14.6% |
Binge Drinking | 10.7% | 18.2% |
Obesity | 51.6% | 40.3% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Eutaw vs Garfield
- More residents in Eutaw report poor mental health at 22.5% compared to 17.2% in Garfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Garfield at 28.7% versus 21.3% in Eutaw.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Eutaw at 27.0% compared to 14.6% in Garfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Garfield at 18.2% compared to 10.7% in Eutaw.
- Obesity rates are higher in Eutaw at 51.6% compared to 40.3% in Garfield.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Garfield at 23.0% compared to 20.0% in Eutaw.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Eutaw | Garfield |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 15.6% (438) | 15.7% (371) |
Less than High School | 16.6% (464) | 10.2% (242) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.8% (470) | 19.4% (458) |
Education Levels Comparison: Eutaw vs Garfield
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Eutaw and Garfield at 0.0%.
- In Garfield, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.7% compared to 15.6% in Eutaw.
- More residents in Eutaw have less than a high school education at 16.6% compared to 10.2% in Garfield.
- In Garfield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 16.8% in Eutaw.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.