Demographics details for Eureka, MO vs Quimby, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Eureka, MO vs Quimby, IA.
| Data | Eureka | Quimby |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,729 | 244 |
| Median Age | 37.9 years | 50.4 years |
| Median Income | $104,697 | $57,500 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 61.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | Data is updating |
Population Comparison: Eureka vs Quimby
- In Eureka, the population is higher at 12,729, compared to 244 in Quimby.
- The median age in Quimby is higher at 50.4 years, compared to 37.9 years in Eureka.
- Eureka has a higher median income of $104,697 compared to $57,500 in Quimby.
- In Quimby, the percentage of married families is higher at 61.0%, compared to 42.0% in Eureka.
- Eureka has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 0% in Quimby.
- The unemployment rate in Eureka is higher at 3.2%, compared to 0.0% in Quimby.
Demographics
Demographics Eureka vs Quimby provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Eureka | Quimby |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 88 | 76 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 24 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Eureka vs Quimby
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Eureka and Quimby at 0%.
- Eureka has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 76% in Quimby.
- The Asian population is larger in Eureka at 2% compared to 0% in Quimby.
- Quimby has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 24%, compared to 2% in Eureka.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Eureka at 8% compared to 0% in Quimby.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Eureka and Quimby at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Eureka | Quimby |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.2% | 15.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.7% | 9.6% |
| Depression | 22.8% | 18.9% |
| Smoking | 14.1% | 17.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.9% | 21.7% |
| Obesity | 30.0% | 41.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Eureka vs Quimby
- In Quimby, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 14.2% in Eureka.
- Depression is more prevalent in Eureka at 22.8% compared to 18.9% in Quimby.
- Quimby has a higher smoking rate at 17.5% compared to 14.1% in Eureka.
- Binge drinking is more common in Eureka at 21.9% compared to 21.7% in Quimby.
- Quimby has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 30.0% in Eureka.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Quimby at 22.0% compared to 7.0% in Eureka.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Eureka | Quimby |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 10.5% (1,337) | 41.8% (102) |
| Less than High School | 3.2% (405) | 30.3% (74) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.1% (3,835) | 9.8% (24) |
Education Levels Comparison: Eureka vs Quimby
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Eureka and Quimby at 0.0%.
- In Quimby, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 41.8% compared to 10.5% in Eureka.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Quimby at 30.3%, compared to 3.2% in Eureka.
- A higher percentage of residents in Eureka hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.1% compared to 9.8% in Quimby.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.