Demographics details for Eureka, MO vs Cottage grove, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Eureka, MO vs Cottage grove, MN.
Data | Eureka | Cottage grove |
---|---|---|
Population | 12,729 | 41,033 |
Median Age | 37.9 years | 36.8 years |
Median Income | $104,697 | $117,673 |
Married Families | 42.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Eureka vs Cottage grove
- The population in Cottage grove is higher at 41,033, compared to 12,729 in Eureka.
- Residents in Eureka have a higher median age of 37.9 years compared to 36.8 years in Cottage grove.
- Cottage grove has a higher median income of $117,673, compared to $104,697 in Eureka.
- In Cottage grove, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 42.0% in Eureka.
- The poverty level is identical in both Eureka and Cottage grove at 5%.
- Cottage grove has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.2% in Eureka.
Demographics
Demographics Eureka vs Cottage grove provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Eureka | Cottage grove |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 6 |
White | 88 | 77 |
Asian | 2 | 6 |
Hispanic | 2 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Eureka vs Cottage grove
- In Cottage grove, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 0% in Eureka.
- Eureka has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 77% in Cottage grove.
- In Cottage grove, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 2% in Eureka.
- Cottage grove has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 2% in Eureka.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Eureka at 8% compared to 6% in Cottage grove.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Eureka and Cottage grove at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Eureka | Cottage grove |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.2% | 13.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.7% | 7.8% |
Depression | 22.8% | 22.5% |
Smoking | 14.1% | 13.2% |
Binge Drinking | 21.9% | 21.6% |
Obesity | 30.0% | 31.3% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Eureka vs Cottage grove
- More residents in Eureka report poor mental health at 14.2% compared to 13.4% in Cottage grove.
- Depression is more prevalent in Eureka at 22.8% compared to 22.5% in Cottage grove.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Eureka at 14.1% compared to 13.2% in Cottage grove.
- Binge drinking is more common in Eureka at 21.9% compared to 21.6% in Cottage grove.
- Cottage grove has higher obesity rates at 31.3% compared to 30.0% in Eureka.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cottage grove at 8.0% compared to 7.0% in Eureka.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Eureka | Cottage grove |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.1% (445) |
High School Diploma | 10.5% (1,337) | 12.5% (5,134) |
Less than High School | 3.2% (405) | 4.8% (1,981) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.1% (3,835) | 24.1% (9,896) |
Education Levels Comparison: Eureka vs Cottage grove
- In Cottage grove, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Eureka.
- In Cottage grove, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.5% compared to 10.5% in Eureka.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cottage grove at 4.8%, compared to 3.2% in Eureka.
- A higher percentage of residents in Eureka hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.1% compared to 24.1% in Cottage grove.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.