Demographics details for Eureka, MO vs Belmont, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Eureka, MO vs Belmont, CA.
| Data | Eureka | Belmont |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,729 | 26,773 |
| Median Age | 37.9 years | 40.9 years |
| Median Income | $104,697 | $185,944 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 2% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Eureka vs Belmont
- The population in Belmont is higher at 26,773, compared to 12,729 in Eureka.
- The median age in Belmont is higher at 40.9 years, compared to 37.9 years in Eureka.
- Belmont has a higher median income of $185,944, compared to $104,697 in Eureka.
- In Belmont, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 42.0% in Eureka.
- Eureka has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 2% in Belmont.
- Belmont has a higher unemployment rate at 3.8% compared to 3.2% in Eureka.
Demographics
Demographics Eureka vs Belmont provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Eureka | Belmont |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 88 | 45 |
| Asian | 2 | 30 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 14 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Eureka vs Belmont
- In Belmont, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Eureka.
- Eureka has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 45% in Belmont.
- In Belmont, the Asian population stands at 30%, greater than 2% in Eureka.
- Belmont has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 14%, compared to 2% in Eureka.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Belmont at 9%, compared to 8% in Eureka.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Eureka and Belmont at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Eureka | Belmont |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.2% | 12.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.7% | 7.1% |
| Depression | 22.8% | 15.5% |
| Smoking | 14.1% | 7.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.9% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 30.0% | 20.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Eureka vs Belmont
- More residents in Eureka report poor mental health at 14.2% compared to 12.2% in Belmont.
- Depression is more prevalent in Eureka at 22.8% compared to 15.5% in Belmont.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Eureka at 14.1% compared to 7.1% in Belmont.
- Binge drinking is more common in Eureka at 21.9% compared to 17.0% in Belmont.
- Obesity rates are higher in Eureka at 30.0% compared to 20.5% in Belmont.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Belmont at 8.0% compared to 7.0% in Eureka.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Eureka | Belmont |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.9% (234) |
| High School Diploma | 10.5% (1,337) | 6.0% (1,604) |
| Less than High School | 3.2% (405) | 5.2% (1,394) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.1% (3,835) | 51.4% (13,763) |
Education Levels Comparison: Eureka vs Belmont
- In Belmont, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Eureka.
- A higher percentage of residents in Eureka hold a high school diploma at 10.5% compared to 6.0% in Belmont.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Belmont at 5.2%, compared to 3.2% in Eureka.
- In Belmont, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 51.4% compared to 30.1% in Eureka.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.