Demographics details for Eureka, MO vs Beaver dam, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Eureka, MO vs Beaver dam, WI.
| Data | Eureka | Beaver dam |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,729 | 16,582 |
| Median Age | 37.9 years | 40.4 years |
| Median Income | $104,697 | $65,802 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Eureka vs Beaver dam
- The population in Beaver dam is higher at 16,582, compared to 12,729 in Eureka.
- The median age in Beaver dam is higher at 40.4 years, compared to 37.9 years in Eureka.
- Eureka has a higher median income of $104,697 compared to $65,802 in Beaver dam.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Eureka at 42.0% compared to 35.0% in Beaver dam.
- Eureka has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 0% in Beaver dam.
- The unemployment rate in Eureka is higher at 3.2%, compared to 3.1% in Beaver dam.
Demographics
Demographics Eureka vs Beaver dam provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Eureka | Beaver dam |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 3 |
| White | 88 | 81 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Eureka vs Beaver dam
- In Beaver dam, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Eureka.
- Eureka has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 81% in Beaver dam.
- Both Eureka and Beaver dam have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Beaver dam has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 2% in Eureka.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Eureka at 8% compared to 6% in Beaver dam.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Eureka and Beaver dam at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Eureka | Beaver dam |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.2% | 15.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.7% | 10.6% |
| Depression | 22.8% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | 14.1% | 17.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.9% | 23.5% |
| Obesity | 30.0% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Eureka vs Beaver dam
- In Beaver dam, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 14.2% in Eureka.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Beaver dam at 23.6% versus 22.8% in Eureka.
- Beaver dam has a higher smoking rate at 17.6% compared to 14.1% in Eureka.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Beaver dam at 23.5% compared to 21.9% in Eureka.
- Beaver dam has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 30.0% in Eureka.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Beaver dam at 11.0% compared to 7.0% in Eureka.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Eureka | Beaver dam |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.3% (47) |
| High School Diploma | 10.5% (1,337) | 23.8% (3,947) |
| Less than High School | 3.2% (405) | 10.3% (1,706) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.1% (3,835) | 18.2% (3,023) |
Education Levels Comparison: Eureka vs Beaver dam
- In Beaver dam, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Eureka.
- In Beaver dam, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.8% compared to 10.5% in Eureka.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Beaver dam at 10.3%, compared to 3.2% in Eureka.
- A higher percentage of residents in Eureka hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.1% compared to 18.2% in Beaver dam.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.