Demographics details for Eunice, NM vs Summerfield, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Eunice, NM vs Summerfield, OH.
| Data | Eunice | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,955 | 242 |
| Median Age | 34.2 years | 49.8 years |
| Median Income | $68,819 | $29,412 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Eunice vs Summerfield
- In Eunice, the population is higher at 2,955, compared to 242 in Summerfield.
- The median age in Summerfield is higher at 49.8 years, compared to 34.2 years in Eunice.
- Eunice has a higher median income of $68,819 compared to $29,412 in Summerfield.
- In Summerfield, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 34.0% in Eunice.
- Eunice has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 13% in Summerfield.
- The unemployment rate in Eunice is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Summerfield.
Demographics
Demographics Eunice vs Summerfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Eunice | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 16 | 97 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 55 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 29 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Eunice vs Summerfield
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Eunice and Summerfield at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Summerfield at 97% compared to 16% in Eunice.
- Both Eunice and Summerfield have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Eunice at 55% compared to 3% in Summerfield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Eunice at 29% compared to 0% in Summerfield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Eunice and Summerfield at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Eunice | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 18.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 21.0% | 24.2% |
| Smoking | 16.9% | 22.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 40.0% | 39.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Eunice vs Summerfield
- In Summerfield, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 16.8% in Eunice.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Summerfield at 24.2% versus 21.0% in Eunice.
- Summerfield has a higher smoking rate at 22.3% compared to 16.9% in Eunice.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Summerfield at 17.9% compared to 16.2% in Eunice.
- Obesity rates are higher in Eunice at 40.0% compared to 39.2% in Summerfield.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Summerfield at 17.0% compared to 16.0% in Eunice.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Eunice | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (43) | 1.2% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 14.0% (415) | 31.4% (76) |
| Less than High School | 34.3% (1,013) | 17.4% (42) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 2.5% (75) | 2.1% (5) |
Education Levels Comparison: Eunice vs Summerfield
- A higher percentage of residents in Eunice have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 1.2% in Summerfield.
- In Summerfield, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 31.4% compared to 14.0% in Eunice.
- More residents in Eunice have less than a high school education at 34.3% compared to 17.4% in Summerfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Eunice hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 2.5% compared to 2.1% in Summerfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.