Demographics details for Eufaula, AL vs New london, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Eufaula, AL vs New london, CT.
| Data | Eufaula | New london |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,539 | 27,980 |
| Median Age | 37.0 years | 35.5 years |
| Median Income | $39,511 | $56,237 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 24.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Eufaula vs New london
- The population in New london is higher at 27,980, compared to 12,539 in Eufaula.
- Residents in Eufaula have a higher median age of 37.0 years compared to 35.5 years in New london.
- New london has a higher median income of $56,237, compared to $39,511 in Eufaula.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Eufaula at 32.0% compared to 24.0% in New london.
- Eufaula has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 12% in New london.
- New london has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.5% in Eufaula.
Demographics
Demographics Eufaula vs New london provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Eufaula | New london |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 45 | 17 |
| White | 48 | 41 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 29 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Eufaula vs New london
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Eufaula at 45% compared to 17% in New london.
- Eufaula has a higher percentage of White residents at 48% compared to 41% in New london.
- In New london, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Eufaula.
- New london has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 4% in Eufaula.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in New london at 11%, compared to 3% in Eufaula.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Eufaula and New london at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Eufaula | New london |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.5% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.1% | 12.5% |
| Depression | 24.6% | 23.3% |
| Smoking | 24.8% | 19.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.6% | 15.2% |
| Obesity | 43.0% | 37.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Eufaula vs New london
- More residents in Eufaula report poor mental health at 21.5% compared to 17.9% in New london.
- Depression is more prevalent in Eufaula at 24.6% compared to 23.3% in New london.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Eufaula at 24.8% compared to 19.5% in New london.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in New london at 15.2% compared to 12.6% in Eufaula.
- Obesity rates are higher in Eufaula at 43.0% compared to 37.1% in New london.
- Disability percentages are higher in Eufaula at 19.0% compared to 14.0% in New london.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Eufaula | New london |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (120) | 1.4% (399) |
| High School Diploma | 19.0% (2,377) | 16.0% (4,487) |
| Less than High School | 18.0% (2,256) | 13.7% (3,830) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.4% (1,430) | 16.9% (4,738) |
Education Levels Comparison: Eufaula vs New london
- In New london, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 1.0% in Eufaula.
- A higher percentage of residents in Eufaula hold a high school diploma at 19.0% compared to 16.0% in New london.
- More residents in Eufaula have less than a high school education at 18.0% compared to 13.7% in New london.
- In New london, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.9% compared to 11.4% in Eufaula.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.