Demographics details for Eufaula, AL vs Klamath falls, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Eufaula, AL vs Klamath falls, OR.
| Data | Eufaula | Klamath falls |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,539 | 21,977 |
| Median Age | 37.0 years | 35.1 years |
| Median Income | $39,511 | $46,695 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Eufaula vs Klamath falls
- The population in Klamath falls is higher at 21,977, compared to 12,539 in Eufaula.
- Residents in Eufaula have a higher median age of 37.0 years compared to 35.1 years in Klamath falls.
- Klamath falls has a higher median income of $46,695, compared to $39,511 in Eufaula.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Eufaula at 32.0% compared to 31.0% in Klamath falls.
- The poverty level is higher in Klamath falls at 18%, compared to 13% in Eufaula.
- Klamath falls has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.5% in Eufaula.
Demographics
Demographics Eufaula vs Klamath falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Eufaula | Klamath falls |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 45 | 1 |
| White | 48 | 69 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 15 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Eufaula vs Klamath falls
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Eufaula at 45% compared to 1% in Klamath falls.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Klamath falls at 69% compared to 48% in Eufaula.
- In Klamath falls, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Eufaula.
- Klamath falls has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 4% in Eufaula.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Klamath falls at 11%, compared to 3% in Eufaula.
- In Klamath falls, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Eufaula.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Eufaula | Klamath falls |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.5% | 20.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.1% | 13.4% |
| Depression | 24.6% | 28.4% |
| Smoking | 24.8% | 19.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.6% | 15.8% |
| Obesity | 43.0% | 35.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Eufaula vs Klamath falls
- More residents in Eufaula report poor mental health at 21.5% compared to 20.2% in Klamath falls.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Klamath falls at 28.4% versus 24.6% in Eufaula.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Eufaula at 24.8% compared to 19.9% in Klamath falls.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Klamath falls at 15.8% compared to 12.6% in Eufaula.
- Obesity rates are higher in Eufaula at 43.0% compared to 35.9% in Klamath falls.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Klamath falls at 20.0% compared to 19.0% in Eufaula.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Eufaula | Klamath falls |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (120) | 0.9% (192) |
| High School Diploma | 19.0% (2,377) | 16.0% (3,508) |
| Less than High School | 18.0% (2,256) | 15.5% (3,401) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.4% (1,430) | 14.4% (3,175) |
Education Levels Comparison: Eufaula vs Klamath falls
- A higher percentage of residents in Eufaula have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.9% in Klamath falls.
- A higher percentage of residents in Eufaula hold a high school diploma at 19.0% compared to 16.0% in Klamath falls.
- More residents in Eufaula have less than a high school education at 18.0% compared to 15.5% in Klamath falls.
- In Klamath falls, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 11.4% in Eufaula.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.