Demographics details for Eufaula, AL vs Cedar grove, WV
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Eufaula, AL vs Cedar grove, WV.
Data | Eufaula | Cedar grove |
---|---|---|
Population | 12,539 | 693 |
Median Age | 37.0 years | 44.3 years |
Median Income | $39,511 | $55,600 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Eufaula vs Cedar grove
- In Eufaula, the population is higher at 12,539, compared to 693 in Cedar grove.
- The median age in Cedar grove is higher at 44.3 years, compared to 37.0 years in Eufaula.
- Cedar grove has a higher median income of $55,600, compared to $39,511 in Eufaula.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Eufaula at 32.0% compared to 31.0% in Cedar grove.
- Eufaula has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 12% in Cedar grove.
- Cedar grove has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Eufaula.
Demographics
Demographics Eufaula vs Cedar grove provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Eufaula | Cedar grove |
---|---|---|
Black | 45 | Data is updating |
White | 48 | 98 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 4 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 3 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Eufaula vs Cedar grove
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Eufaula at 45% compared to 0% in Cedar grove.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cedar grove at 98% compared to 48% in Eufaula.
- Both Eufaula and Cedar grove have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Eufaula at 4% compared to 0% in Cedar grove.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Eufaula at 3% compared to 2% in Cedar grove.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Eufaula and Cedar grove at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Eufaula | Cedar grove |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 21.5% | 22.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.1% | 15.7% |
Depression | 24.6% | 30.1% |
Smoking | 24.8% | 24.6% |
Binge Drinking | 12.6% | 13.9% |
Obesity | 43.0% | 40.4% |
Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Eufaula vs Cedar grove
- In Cedar grove, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 22.3% compared to 21.5% in Eufaula.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cedar grove at 30.1% versus 24.6% in Eufaula.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Eufaula at 24.8% compared to 24.6% in Cedar grove.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cedar grove at 13.9% compared to 12.6% in Eufaula.
- Obesity rates are higher in Eufaula at 43.0% compared to 40.4% in Cedar grove.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cedar grove at 20.0% compared to 19.0% in Eufaula.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Eufaula | Cedar grove |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (120) | 0.6% (4) |
High School Diploma | 19.0% (2,377) | 21.2% (147) |
Less than High School | 18.0% (2,256) | 18.5% (128) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.4% (1,430) | 2.3% (16) |
Education Levels Comparison: Eufaula vs Cedar grove
- A higher percentage of residents in Eufaula have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.6% in Cedar grove.
- In Cedar grove, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.2% compared to 19.0% in Eufaula.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cedar grove at 18.5%, compared to 18.0% in Eufaula.
- A higher percentage of residents in Eufaula hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.4% compared to 2.3% in Cedar grove.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.