Demographics details for Eufaula, AL vs Breckenridge, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Eufaula, AL vs Breckenridge, MN.
Data | Eufaula | Breckenridge |
---|---|---|
Population | 12,539 | 3,348 |
Median Age | 37.0 years | 41.3 years |
Median Income | $39,511 | $57,094 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Eufaula vs Breckenridge
- In Eufaula, the population is higher at 12,539, compared to 3,348 in Breckenridge.
- The median age in Breckenridge is higher at 41.3 years, compared to 37.0 years in Eufaula.
- Breckenridge has a higher median income of $57,094, compared to $39,511 in Eufaula.
- In Breckenridge, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 32.0% in Eufaula.
- Eufaula has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 10% in Breckenridge.
- Breckenridge has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.5% in Eufaula.
Demographics
Demographics Eufaula vs Breckenridge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Eufaula | Breckenridge |
---|---|---|
Black | 45 | Data is updating |
White | 48 | 95 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 4 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Eufaula vs Breckenridge
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Eufaula at 45% compared to 0% in Breckenridge.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Breckenridge at 95% compared to 48% in Eufaula.
- Both Eufaula and Breckenridge have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Eufaula at 4% compared to 3% in Breckenridge.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Eufaula at 3% compared to 2% in Breckenridge.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Eufaula and Breckenridge at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Eufaula | Breckenridge |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 21.5% | 14.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.1% | 9.1% |
Depression | 24.6% | 22.6% |
Smoking | 24.8% | 16.8% |
Binge Drinking | 12.6% | 20.8% |
Obesity | 43.0% | 38.6% |
Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Eufaula vs Breckenridge
- More residents in Eufaula report poor mental health at 21.5% compared to 14.7% in Breckenridge.
- Depression is more prevalent in Eufaula at 24.6% compared to 22.6% in Breckenridge.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Eufaula at 24.8% compared to 16.8% in Breckenridge.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Breckenridge at 20.8% compared to 12.6% in Eufaula.
- Obesity rates are higher in Eufaula at 43.0% compared to 38.6% in Breckenridge.
- Disability percentages are higher in Eufaula at 19.0% compared to 18.0% in Breckenridge.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Eufaula | Breckenridge |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (120) | 1.1% (37) |
High School Diploma | 19.0% (2,377) | 19.8% (662) |
Less than High School | 18.0% (2,256) | 11.7% (392) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.4% (1,430) | 18.4% (616) |
Education Levels Comparison: Eufaula vs Breckenridge
- In Breckenridge, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 1.0% in Eufaula.
- In Breckenridge, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.8% compared to 19.0% in Eufaula.
- More residents in Eufaula have less than a high school education at 18.0% compared to 11.7% in Breckenridge.
- In Breckenridge, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.4% compared to 11.4% in Eufaula.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.