Demographics details for Eufaula, AL vs Antlers, OK

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Eufaula, AL vs Antlers, OK.

Data Eufaula Antlers
Population 12,539 2,198
Median Age 37.0 years 36.7 years
Median Income $39,511 $27,798
Married Families 32.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 13% 18%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.5

Population Comparison: Eufaula vs Antlers

  • In Eufaula, the population is higher at 12,539, compared to 2,198 in Antlers.
  • Residents in Eufaula have a higher median age of 37.0 years compared to 36.7 years in Antlers.
  • Eufaula has a higher median income of $39,511 compared to $27,798 in Antlers.
  • In Antlers, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 32.0% in Eufaula.
  • The poverty level is higher in Antlers at 18%, compared to 13% in Eufaula.
  • Antlers has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Eufaula.

Demographics

Demographics Eufaula vs Antlers provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Eufaula Antlers
Black 45 3
White 48 63
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 4 5
Two or More Races 3 15
American Indian Data is updating 13

Demographics Comparison: Eufaula vs Antlers

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Eufaula at 45% compared to 3% in Antlers.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Antlers at 63% compared to 48% in Eufaula.
  • In Antlers, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Eufaula.
  • Antlers has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 4% in Eufaula.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Antlers at 15%, compared to 3% in Eufaula.
  • In Antlers, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 13%, compared to 0% in Eufaula.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Eufaula Antlers
Mental Health Not Good 21.5% 21.3%
Physical Health Not Good 16.1% 15.6%
Depression 24.6% 28.5%
Smoking 24.8% 26.4%
Binge Drinking 12.6% 14.1%
Obesity 43.0% 40.5%
Disability Percentage 19.0% 36.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Eufaula vs Antlers

  • More residents in Eufaula report poor mental health at 21.5% compared to 21.3% in Antlers.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Antlers at 28.5% versus 24.6% in Eufaula.
  • Antlers has a higher smoking rate at 26.4% compared to 24.8% in Eufaula.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Antlers at 14.1% compared to 12.6% in Eufaula.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Eufaula at 43.0% compared to 40.5% in Antlers.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Antlers at 36.0% compared to 19.0% in Eufaula.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Eufaula Antlers
No Schooling 1.0% (120) 1.0% (23)
High School Diploma 19.0% (2,377) 23.4% (515)
Less than High School 18.0% (2,256) 26.2% (575)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.4% (1,430) 10.7% (236)

Education Levels Comparison: Eufaula vs Antlers

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Eufaula and Antlers at 1.0%.
  • In Antlers, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.4% compared to 19.0% in Eufaula.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Antlers at 26.2%, compared to 18.0% in Eufaula.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Eufaula hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.4% compared to 10.7% in Antlers.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.