Demographics details for Eubank, KY vs Washington, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Eubank, KY vs Washington, NC.
| Data | Eubank | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 323 | 10,828 |
| Median Age | 33.4 years | 48.0 years |
| Median Income | $44,205 | $38,927 |
| Married Families | 53.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 17% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Eubank vs Washington
- The population in Washington is higher at 10,828, compared to 323 in Eubank.
- The median age in Washington is higher at 48.0 years, compared to 33.4 years in Eubank.
- Eubank has a higher median income of $44,205 compared to $38,927 in Washington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Eubank at 53.0% compared to 34.0% in Washington.
- Eubank has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 16% in Washington.
- Washington has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 4.5% in Eubank.
Demographics
Demographics Eubank vs Washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Eubank | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 49 |
| White | 100 | 41 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 6 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Eubank vs Washington
- In Washington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 49% compared to 0% in Eubank.
- Eubank has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 41% in Washington.
- Both Eubank and Washington have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Washington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 0% in Eubank.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Washington at 3%, compared to 0% in Eubank.
- In Washington, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Eubank.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Eubank | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.1% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.6% | 13.8% |
| Depression | 31.3% | 22.8% |
| Smoking | 25.6% | 21.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.0% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 40.0% | 43.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 33.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Eubank vs Washington
- More residents in Eubank report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 18.3% in Washington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Eubank at 31.3% compared to 22.8% in Washington.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Eubank at 25.6% compared to 21.9% in Washington.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Washington at 14.7% compared to 14.0% in Eubank.
- Washington has higher obesity rates at 43.3% compared to 40.0% in Eubank.
- Disability percentages are higher in Eubank at 33.0% compared to 24.0% in Washington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Eubank | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.2% (128) |
| High School Diploma | 41.2% (133) | 19.0% (2,058) |
| Less than High School | 21.7% (70) | 13.7% (1,487) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.9% (3) | 10.3% (1,118) |
Education Levels Comparison: Eubank vs Washington
- In Washington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Eubank.
- A higher percentage of residents in Eubank hold a high school diploma at 41.2% compared to 19.0% in Washington.
- More residents in Eubank have less than a high school education at 21.7% compared to 13.7% in Washington.
- In Washington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.3% compared to 0.9% in Eubank.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.