Demographics details for Eubank, KY vs Springer, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Eubank, KY vs Springer, OK.
| Data | Eubank | Springer |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 323 | 694 |
| Median Age | 33.4 years | 30.3 years |
| Median Income | $44,205 | $51,630 |
| Married Families | 53.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 17% | 17% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Eubank vs Springer
- The population in Springer is higher at 694, compared to 323 in Eubank.
- Residents in Eubank have a higher median age of 33.4 years compared to 30.3 years in Springer.
- Springer has a higher median income of $51,630, compared to $44,205 in Eubank.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Eubank at 53.0% compared to 42.0% in Springer.
- The poverty level is identical in both Eubank and Springer at 17%.
- The unemployment rate in Eubank is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Springer.
Demographics
Demographics Eubank vs Springer provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Eubank | Springer |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 5 |
| White | 100 | 54 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 7 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 21 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 13 |
Demographics Comparison: Eubank vs Springer
- In Springer, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Eubank.
- Eubank has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 54% in Springer.
- Both Eubank and Springer have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Springer has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 0% in Eubank.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Springer at 21%, compared to 0% in Eubank.
- In Springer, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 13%, compared to 0% in Eubank.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Eubank | Springer |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.1% | 18.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.6% | 12.6% |
| Depression | 31.3% | 26.0% |
| Smoking | 25.6% | 20.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.0% | 15.6% |
| Obesity | 40.0% | 39.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 33.0% | 29.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Eubank vs Springer
- More residents in Eubank report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 18.7% in Springer.
- Depression is more prevalent in Eubank at 31.3% compared to 26.0% in Springer.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Eubank at 25.6% compared to 20.5% in Springer.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Springer at 15.6% compared to 14.0% in Eubank.
- Obesity rates are higher in Eubank at 40.0% compared to 39.9% in Springer.
- Disability percentages are higher in Eubank at 33.0% compared to 29.0% in Springer.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Eubank | Springer |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 41.2% (133) | 19.2% (133) |
| Less than High School | 21.7% (70) | 19.6% (136) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.9% (3) | 9.4% (65) |
Education Levels Comparison: Eubank vs Springer
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Eubank and Springer at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Eubank hold a high school diploma at 41.2% compared to 19.2% in Springer.
- More residents in Eubank have less than a high school education at 21.7% compared to 19.6% in Springer.
- In Springer, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.4% compared to 0.9% in Eubank.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.