Demographics details for Eubank, KY vs Ingalls, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Eubank, KY vs Ingalls, MI.
Data | Eubank | Ingalls |
---|---|---|
Population | 323 | 150 |
Median Age | 33.4 years | 35.0 years |
Median Income | $44,205 | $60,000 |
Married Families | 53.0% | 50.0% |
Poverty Level | 17% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Eubank vs Ingalls
- In Eubank, the population is higher at 323, compared to 150 in Ingalls.
- The median age in Ingalls is higher at 35.0 years, compared to 33.4 years in Eubank.
- Ingalls has a higher median income of $60,000, compared to $44,205 in Eubank.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Eubank at 53.0% compared to 50.0% in Ingalls.
- Eubank has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 10% in Ingalls.
- Ingalls has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.5% in Eubank.
Demographics
Demographics Eubank vs Ingalls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Eubank | Ingalls |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
White | 100 | 90 |
Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Eubank vs Ingalls
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Eubank and Ingalls at 0%.
- Eubank has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 90% in Ingalls.
- In Ingalls, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Eubank.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Eubank and Ingalls at 0%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ingalls at 5%, compared to 0% in Eubank.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Eubank and Ingalls at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Eubank | Ingalls |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 21.1% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.6% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 31.3% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 25.6% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 14.0% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 40.0% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 33.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Eubank vs Ingalls
- More residents in Eubank report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 0.0% in Ingalls.
- Depression is more prevalent in Eubank at 31.3% compared to 0.0% in Ingalls.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Eubank at 25.6% compared to 0.0% in Ingalls.
- Binge drinking is more common in Eubank at 14.0% compared to 0.0% in Ingalls.
- Obesity rates are higher in Eubank at 40.0% compared to 0.0% in Ingalls.
- Disability percentages are higher in Eubank at 33.0% compared to 0.0% in Ingalls.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Eubank | Ingalls |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 41.2% (133) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 21.7% (70) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.9% (3) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Eubank vs Ingalls
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Eubank and Ingalls at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Eubank hold a high school diploma at 41.2% compared to 0.0% in Ingalls.
- More residents in Eubank have less than a high school education at 21.7% compared to 0.0% in Ingalls.
- A higher percentage of residents in Eubank hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Ingalls.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.