Demographics details for Essex junction, VT vs Westerville, OH

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Essex junction, VT vs Westerville, OH.

Data Essex junction Westerville
Population 10,917 38,466
Median Age 39.9 years 40.8 years
Median Income $92,589 $103,617
Married Families 46.0% 49.0%
Poverty Level 6% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 2.5 4.4

Population Comparison: Essex junction vs Westerville

  • The population in Westerville is higher at 38,466, compared to 10,917 in Essex junction.
  • The median age in Westerville is higher at 40.8 years, compared to 39.9 years in Essex junction.
  • Westerville has a higher median income of $103,617, compared to $92,589 in Essex junction.
  • In Westerville, the percentage of married families is higher at 49.0%, compared to 46.0% in Essex junction.
  • Essex junction has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 0% in Westerville.
  • Westerville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.4% compared to 2.5% in Essex junction.

Demographics

Demographics Essex junction vs Westerville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Essex junction Westerville
Black 3 7
White 79 82
Asian 8 3
Hispanic 2 2
Two or More Races 8 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Essex junction vs Westerville

  • In Westerville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 3% in Essex junction.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Westerville at 82% compared to 79% in Essex junction.
  • The Asian population is larger in Essex junction at 8% compared to 3% in Westerville.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Essex junction and Westerville at 2%.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Essex junction at 8% compared to 6% in Westerville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Essex junction and Westerville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Essex junction Westerville
Mental Health Not Good 15.1% 15.7%
Physical Health Not Good 8.1% 9.0%
Depression 27.1% 23.3%
Smoking 11.8% 13.5%
Binge Drinking 20.9% 19.7%
Obesity 26.4% 33.3%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Essex junction vs Westerville

  • In Westerville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 15.1% in Essex junction.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Essex junction at 27.1% compared to 23.3% in Westerville.
  • Westerville has a higher smoking rate at 13.5% compared to 11.8% in Essex junction.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Essex junction at 20.9% compared to 19.7% in Westerville.
  • Westerville has higher obesity rates at 33.3% compared to 26.4% in Essex junction.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Essex junction at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Westerville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Essex junction Westerville
No Schooling 1.5% (162) 0.3% (131)
High School Diploma 8.2% (899) 9.9% (3,815)
Less than High School 8.8% (966) 2.5% (972)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 34.3% (3,742) 40.3% (15,513)

Education Levels Comparison: Essex junction vs Westerville

  • A higher percentage of residents in Essex junction have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.3% in Westerville.
  • In Westerville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 9.9% compared to 8.2% in Essex junction.
  • More residents in Essex junction have less than a high school education at 8.8% compared to 2.5% in Westerville.
  • In Westerville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 40.3% compared to 34.3% in Essex junction.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.