Demographics details for Essex junction, VT vs Warner robins, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Essex junction, VT vs Warner robins, GA.

Data Essex junction Warner robins
Population 10,917 82,175
Median Age 39.9 years 32.4 years
Median Income $92,589 $63,678
Married Families 46.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level 6% 8%
Unemployment Rate 2.5 3.8

Population Comparison: Essex junction vs Warner robins

  • The population in Warner robins is higher at 82,175, compared to 10,917 in Essex junction.
  • Residents in Essex junction have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 32.4 years in Warner robins.
  • Essex junction has a higher median income of $92,589 compared to $63,678 in Warner robins.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Essex junction at 46.0% compared to 32.0% in Warner robins.
  • The poverty level is higher in Warner robins at 8%, compared to 6% in Essex junction.
  • Warner robins has a higher unemployment rate at 3.8% compared to 2.5% in Essex junction.

Demographics

Demographics Essex junction vs Warner robins provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Essex junction Warner robins
Black 3 40
White 79 42
Asian 8 3
Hispanic 2 7
Two or More Races 8 7
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Essex junction vs Warner robins

  • In Warner robins, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 40% compared to 3% in Essex junction.
  • Essex junction has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 42% in Warner robins.
  • The Asian population is larger in Essex junction at 8% compared to 3% in Warner robins.
  • Warner robins has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 2% in Essex junction.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Essex junction at 8% compared to 7% in Warner robins.
  • In Warner robins, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Essex junction.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Essex junction Warner robins
Mental Health Not Good 15.1% 17.6%
Physical Health Not Good 8.1% 13.1%
Depression 27.1% 22.1%
Smoking 11.8% 18.6%
Binge Drinking 20.9% 15.9%
Obesity 26.4% 39.9%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Essex junction vs Warner robins

  • In Warner robins, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 15.1% in Essex junction.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Essex junction at 27.1% compared to 22.1% in Warner robins.
  • Warner robins has a higher smoking rate at 18.6% compared to 11.8% in Essex junction.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Essex junction at 20.9% compared to 15.9% in Warner robins.
  • Warner robins has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 26.4% in Essex junction.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Warner robins at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Essex junction.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Essex junction Warner robins
No Schooling 1.5% (162) 0.4% (335)
High School Diploma 8.2% (899) 14.9% (12,260)
Less than High School 8.8% (966) 7.0% (5,714)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 34.3% (3,742) 19.2% (15,752)

Education Levels Comparison: Essex junction vs Warner robins

  • A higher percentage of residents in Essex junction have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.4% in Warner robins.
  • In Warner robins, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.9% compared to 8.2% in Essex junction.
  • More residents in Essex junction have less than a high school education at 8.8% compared to 7.0% in Warner robins.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Essex junction hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.3% compared to 19.2% in Warner robins.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.